My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Driveway info
Orono
>
Property Files
>
Street Address
>
B
>
Bayside Road - (AKA: Co. Rd. 84)
>
4645 Bayside Road - 06-117-23-22-0009
>
Land Use
>
Driveway info
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/22/2023 5:24:50 PM
Creation date
9/8/2015 1:49:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
x Address Old
House Number
4645
Street Name
Bayside
Street Type
Road
Address
4645 Bayside Rd
Document Type
Land Use
PIN
0611723220009
Supplemental fields
ProcessedPID
Updated
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
- A condition of plat approval was that Outlots A-B-C remain in common ownership until C is <br /> developed. <br /> - Conditions of plat approval were revisited in a lot line rearrangement between Olson and <br /> Geffre in 1996 (File #2064, Resolution No. 3669) in which Geffre gained a small portion of <br /> Outlot C which contained an old shed. The prior conditions of approval were then revised so that <br /> Geffre would own 4665 plus Outlot A plus the parcel for the shed; and Olson would own the <br /> remainder of Outlot C plus Outlots B and D. each owner was then to legally combine their <br /> respective parcels. <br /> - The combinations apparently have not happened, as Erv Wachman is listed in Hennepin <br /> County Tax Records as the owner of Outlots B-C-D as 3 separate tax parcels (with City of Orono <br /> as taxpayer on B-D), and Geffre is listed as owner of Outlot A separate from 4665. This is not a <br /> big problem, considering that Wachman is almost certain to need Outlots B/D for access now <br /> that the plat of Chadwick to the west was created without providing potential road access to <br /> Outlot C. <br /> Given all the above factors, commitments, conditions of past approvals and later revisions, I <br /> would conclude the following: <br /> 1. Wachman will almost certainly need to use Outlots B and D for access to Outlot C. <br /> 2. Outlot C is likely to develop with one or more homes in the foreseeable future, and will <br /> either develop a driveway or a road within Outlots B & D. <br /> 3. It has been the City's intent from the beginning that the driveways far 4645 and 4665 be <br /> consolidated with the driveway or road that is eventually developed in Outlot B serving <br /> Outlot C. This intent has not changed. Therefore, we should not issue a permit for 4665 <br /> to have a separate driveway east of Outlot B without addressing the issue of access <br /> consolidation. <br /> 4. If the owners of 4645 would allow Wachman and Geffre to gain access to Bayside via the <br /> proposed new driveway east of Outlot B, we would likely assist in revising the conditions <br /> of prior approvals to accommodate this potentially safer alternative access point. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.