Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, March 14, 2022 <br />6:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Page 5 of 8 <br /> <br />BIG ISLAND DOCK LICENSE REQUEST – JOE THULL – Continued <br /> <br />Mr. Thull replied in the affirmative, noting it is a straight pathway and connects to the interior roads. <br /> <br />Johnson made it clear in the past that it is important to him that the City does not have an expense. In his <br />mind they are bending over backwards to help create a solution. He sees in the packet that along with 15 <br />years of dock installation and storage the City’s investment is about $34,905 and he is not in support of <br />any taxpayer money going to subsidize a dock that only allows for one slip. The burden of expense must <br />fall completely on the dock user. Johnson asked to understand the $12,000 expense for engineering and <br />surveying with Bolton and Menk. <br /> <br />Barnhart replied in the application with the LMCD the City was required to provide a survey. They <br />surveyed three dock sites to mark boundaries and generated a document; unfortunately through his own <br />interpretation of the LMCD rules he had to update the document a couple of times. That is where the <br />expense comes from. <br /> <br />Edwards noted the initial survey was about 84 hours of effort for three access points and the adjoining <br />right-of-way network. <br /> <br />Johnson walked through the various expenses associated with the site, noting the City investment is <br />approximately $8,500, including $1,000 each year for installation and removal. Johnson’s proposal is that <br />the Applicant must cover the City costs and also a yearly fee. <br /> <br />Mayor Walsh replied it would be like going out and renting a slip at a marina on the lake, which would be <br />approximately $7,500 for the summer. <br /> <br />Crosby agrees they need to focus on recuperating costs and packing in a generous depreciation rate. <br /> <br />The City Council discussed the item, including potential fees, dates for application, and the first option to <br />renew. <br /> <br />Crosby thinks around $6,000 per year is a good number, noting at a marina one receives electricity and <br />other amenities. He stated by the second year the City would be positive in costs. <br /> <br />Attorney Mattick stated tonight they are looking for direction regarding the language of the license <br />agreement and it will be brought back before the City Council. <br /> <br />Alice Reinmann, 440 Big Island, asked to speak. She represents her husband John and neighbors Jeff and <br />Olivia Hornig at 450 Big Island. Both families are on either side of the access point being considered this <br />evening. After much misinformation, they now understand that the dock is to be 20 feet long and 3 feet <br />wide and that the Thull lot is an unimproved, inland lot with no access to water or sewer and without a <br />structure. The Reinmanns and Hornigs have been misled and misdirected multiple times. In the fall they <br />were assured all seven right-of-way locations were being surveyed which did not happen. The Hornigs <br />attended a City Council meeting in 2021 opposing access for the dock and at the meeting they were told <br />by the mayor that he was unsure why they attended the meeting because their side of the island was not <br />being considered for access. The Hornigs asked why the Minnetonka Squadron was not brought up as a <br />viable solution for the Thulls and landlocked owners as there is a clear path to walk to their property. This <br />option costs the City zero time, zero money, zero maintenance, and removes safety issues for pathways to