My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-14-2022 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2022
>
03-14-2022 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/24/2022 1:45:17 PM
Creation date
5/24/2022 1:42:01 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
219
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
feedback from Mike and his lack of enthusiasm for such a meeting, the <br />decision was made to postpone until after Planning Commission reviewed <br />the application. Mike had cc’d another resident suggesting I follow up with <br />him because he had a larger community outreach net that would be helpful <br />as we contacted neighbors because Mike wasn’t as involved in the project <br />opposition group now that he is serving as a Long Lake City Council <br />member. He also suggested we just email our entire application packet and <br />let this other resident distribute it. <br /> <br />I responded, introduced myself to this person, and respectfully declined to <br />forward all of our plans and information before it was made public by the <br />city. This resident is not an LLRC spokesperson nor is he a representative, <br />so it’s unreasonable to suggest we’d agree to let him represent us in <br />something so important. We have always tried to engage the public in in- <br />person meetings, present any plans or materials, and have a meaningful <br />dialog about it. We did this pre-Covid during 2 meetings for lakeshore <br />residents at the fire station, 2 Park Commission meetings and 1 City <br />Council meeting, and countless individual meetings in person and on the <br />phone. <br /> <br />The response I received was an unnecessarily rude, personal rebuke that <br />questioned my integrity, my leadership, and the ethics of LLRC’s leadership <br />and suggested we were taking a back door route around proper legal <br />channels. Despite this, I offered to talk or meet with him, but he has never <br />agreed to a meeting or even a phone call from anyone at LLRC. <br /> <br />Then Mike introduced me via email to another resident who was very active <br />on community social media in the run-up to the January 18th Orono <br />Planning Commission Meeting. Our club director Amy Johnson and I set up <br />a Zoom call on Friday, January 14th, we spoke for about 45 minutes, parts <br />of it were productive and we thanked him for his point of view and <br />suggestions. The next day he was back on social media and <br />misrepresented our discussions on a number of topics, including the <br />public’s access to our upstairs training space. Despite indicating that our <br />rowing machine room could be made available, the resident falsely <br />reported that LLRC had no plans to let anyone outside of the team use the <br />space. If he was expecting that we would have left the building unlocked <br />and our fleet unprotected, he hasn’t been listening. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.