My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-11-2022 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2022
>
04-11-2022 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/24/2022 1:28:10 PM
Creation date
5/24/2022 1:23:16 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
165
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
FILE # LA22-000001 <br />22 Feb 2022 <br />Page 6 of 7 <br /> <br />6) Compatible with the surrounding area as the area is used both presently and as it is planned to be <br />used in the future; No change is proposed. The guest house use will likely have a more limited <br />occupation than a principal home on a property. <br />7) Consistent with the character of the surrounding area, unless a change of character is called for in <br />the community management plan; The home proposed to be a guest house exists today. The <br />existing condition is consistent with the existing character. <br />8) Compatible with the character of buildings and site improvements in the surrounding area, unless a <br />change of character is called for in the community management plan; No change is proposed. The <br />current “Swenson” house is proposed to be maintained as a guest house. <br />9) Not expected to substantially impair the use and enjoyment of the property in the area or have a <br />materially adverse impact on the property values in the area when compared to the impairment or <br />impact of generally permitted uses; Considering the prescribed density of the district, it is possible <br />that the use of a guest house on a nonconforming-sized property could impact property values in <br />the area. <br />10) Provided with screening and buffering adequate to mitigate undesirable views and activities likely to <br />disturb surrounding uses; The existing home is screened from Casco Point Road and the lake (due <br />to the setback). The most affected neighbor would be the Abbotts who have supported the Oares’ <br />request for a guest house use. No additional screening would be required. <br />11) Not create a nuisance which generates smoke, noise, glare, vibration, odors, fumes, dust, electrical <br />interference, general unsightliness, or other means; The listed impacts are not expected to be <br />generated by the proposed use of the structure for a guest house. <br />12) Not cause excessive non-residential traffic on residential streets, parking needs that cause a <br />demonstrable inconvenience to adjoining properties, traffic congestion, or unsafe access; The guest <br />house is to be used only for the occupants of the principal dwelling or their non-paying guests, <br />there should be no increase of traffic. <br />13) Designed to take into account the natural, scenic, and historic features of the area and to minimize <br />environmental impact; Not applicable, the structure is existing. <br />14) All exterior lighting shall be so directed so as not to cast glare toward or onto the public right-of-way <br />or neighboring residential uses or districts; There are no proposed changes to exterior lighting; and <br />15) Not detrimental to the public health, public safety, or general welfare. There are no expected <br />impacts to these concerns. <br />A CUP may be granted subject to such conditions as the Council may prescribe. Additionally, a CUP shall <br />remain in effect as long as the conditions imposed by the City Council are observed, but nothing in this <br />section shall prevent the city from enacting or amending official controls to change the status of conditional <br />uses. <br /> <br />Engineer Comments. Regarding the proposed new driveway on the Oare property to serve the guest house, <br />City Code permits one curb cut per property. If the Oares wish to add the guest house curb cut they should <br />request the Council authorize them a second curb cut. <br /> <br />Public Comments <br />The applicants have provided comments from their neighbors which are attached as Exhibit G. No additional <br />comments from the public have been received. <br /> <br />Issues for Consideration <br />1. Does the Planning Commission find that that the property owners proposes to use the properties in a <br />reasonable manner which is not permitted by an official control? <br />2. Does the Planning Commission find that the variance(s), if granted, will not alter the essential <br />character of the neighborhood?
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.