Laserfiche WebLink
Date Application Received: 03.23.2022 <br />Date Application Considered as Complete: 03.28.2022 <br />60-Day Review Period Expires: 05.27.2022 <br /> <br /> <br />To: Mark McCutcheon and Planning Commission Members <br /> Adam Edwards, City Administrator <br /> <br />From: Laura Oakden , LLO <br /> <br />Date: April 18, 2022 <br /> <br />Subject: LA22-000014, Eric Zehnder, 940 North Arm Drive, Variance, Public Hearing <br /> <br /> <br />Background <br />The applicant is currently constructing a new home on the property, issued on July 2021. The <br />site has a large sloped yard to Lake Minnetonka. In 2011, a previous owner removed the then <br />existing home, and did not restore the grade after removing the basement area leave a large <br />depression in the property. The applicant is proposing to use some of the earth excavated from <br />the new house project and fill in the large hole from the previous building to even out of the <br />yard between the house and the lake. In this area, a pool, patio, and retaining wall are <br />proposed. The average lakeshore setback allowed for these accessory structure improvements <br />but limited the allowed height at 42 inches (3.5 feet) above existing grade. This improvements <br />are proposed to be approximately 11.5 feet above existing grade. Staff has analyzed the slope <br />with the neighboring properties and determined the current project would still be roughly 8 feet <br />above the estimated natural grade of the neighboring properties. <br /> <br />Practical Difficulties Analysis <br />Applicant Submittal Information: The applicant has identified the unique existing grade left over <br />from the removal of a previous home and slope in the lake yard as practical difficulties <br />supporting the requested variance. Additionally, they have provided supporting documentation <br />regarding Practical Difficulties attached as Exhibit B, and should be asked for additional <br />testimony regarding the application. <br /> <br />Planning Staff Practical Difficulty Analysis: Regarding practical difficulty, Staff finds the grade is a <br />unique challenge to the property and not created by the current homeowner. The proposed <br />project will create a more natural grading pattern consistent with the neighboring properties. <br />However, the property owner can install these improvements without elevating the existing <br />grade by lowering the proposed pool or patio to the existing contours and using stairs to access <br />the space from the house. Elevating the improvements is a convenience to the homeowners <br />and not a necessary for the use of the property. <br /> <br />LOT ANALYSIS WORKSHEET <br />Section 78-330 – Pool Setbacks: <br />Application Summary: The applicant is requesting an average lakeshore setback variance to <br />elevate the grade lakeward of the setback over 42 inches in height. <br />Staff Recommendation: Planning Department Staff recommends denial.