Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />Monday, April 18, 2022 <br />6:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />2. LA22-000012 Stonewood LLC, 2987 + 3005 Casco Point Rd and PID 20-117-23-34-0027, <br />Sketch Plan (Staff: Melanie Curtis) <br /> <br />Michael Gorman, property owner, and Sven Gustafson, Stonewood LLC, were present. <br /> <br />City Planner Curtis gave a summary of the item noting the Hartzell Addition was platted in 1985. Each of <br />the lots are conforming with respect to area and width. Lot 1 containing the tennis court was platted as a <br />non-lakeshore lot; Lots 2 and 3 were platted as lakeshore lots. The Applicant is proposing to re-plat all <br />three lots and is requesting informal feedback on their sketch plan proposal to move the lot lines in order <br />to create one more lakeshore lot. In order to create a third lakeshore lot, one of the three lots will become <br />non-conforming with respect to width. Their proposal reflects movement of the shared lot lines on all <br />three properties. As a result, the existing Lot 3 (3005 Casco Point Rd) is proposed to be 65 feet wide at <br />the ordinary high water level (OHWL), and 75 feet wide at the 75-foot setback where 100 feet is required. <br />The Applicant is requesting feedback and if positive feedback is obtained they intend to proceed with the <br />preliminary plat application. <br /> <br />McCutcheon noted this is a non-conforming proposal. <br /> <br />Curtis replied in the affirmative. <br /> <br />Kirchner asked if Lot 3 is currently conforming but would be non-conforming. <br /> <br />Curtis replied in the affirmative. <br /> <br />Kirchner stated they are taking a conforming lot and making it non-conforming to plat another lakeshore <br />lot. <br /> <br />Curtis replied in the affirmative. <br /> <br />Bonnie Martinson, 2970 Casco Point Road, could write a book about the drainage issues across the street <br />from those properties. In 2010 a new drain was put in which was supposed to take care of the drainage <br />issues coming from the Hartzell property and the other side, as well. A new house was built across the <br />street some time ago and they removed a catch basin. Ms. Martinson and another neighbor are very <br />concerned regarding drainage on those properties because right now the drainage from the Hartzell <br />property is coming down the road into the drains which go across their properties and drain into the lake. <br />The 2010 drain they put in is not adequate. Ms. Martinson has pictures to show what happens when it <br />rains in their area. In 2010, the City’s Engineer decided to put a catch basin between Ms. Martinson’s <br />house and the neighbors that was supposed to catch debris from the gravel that washes down the drain and <br />is supposedly to be vacuumed out on a yearly basis. Ms. Martinson does not know if Orono even has a <br />vac to get the debris out and noted it never gets cleaned out. All of the debris goes through the drain and <br />the rest goes onto Ms. Martinson’s and the neighbor’s properties. She thinks it really needs to be looked <br />at by the City to understand what happens when it rains and how the drainage flows. <br /> <br />Sven Gustafson, Stonewood LLC, does not think the removal of the catch basin Ms. Martinson mentioned <br />ever happened. He noted they had an approved drainage plan that was followed and this is the first he’s <br />heard that there is any concern about drainage created by that property. His clients intend to build <br />personal homes on the subject property and are focused on making the lots more consistent with the