Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, May 9, 2022 <br />6:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br />Page 4 of 7 <br />COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT REPORT <br />15.LA22-000012 – STONEWOOD LLC., 2987 & 3005 CASCO POINT ROAD AND PID 20- <br />117-23-34-0027, SKETCH PLAN <br />Curtis stated the application is a sketch plan to create an additional lakeshore lot from the existing. The <br />Applicant tis proposing to re-plat all three lots in the Hartzell Addition. The LL1C district dimensional <br />minimums are ½ acre and 100 feet in width. In April the Planning Commission discussed the sketch plan <br />and although no public hearing was held, members of the public did provide comment centering on <br />existing drainage concerns on Casco Point Road and house locations on the properties; submitted <br />comments are included in the packet. Since Planning Commission’s review the Applicant’s surveyor has <br />reanalyzed the existing property dimensions and has determined that lot 2 is 97 feet wide at the 75 foot <br />setback where 100 feet is required and is currently non-conforming. The Applicant is requesting informal <br />feedback. Initially Staff did not support the proposal as there were no identified practical difficulties <br />supporting the creation of a non-conforming lot where three conforming lots existed. The new <br />information regarding the existing non-conformity of lot 2 changes the analysis. While there are two <br />conforming lots and one non-conforming lots now, at the conclusion of this process there will be two <br />conforming lots and one non-conforming. The non-conforming status is proposed to change from one lot <br />(Lot 2) to another (Lot 3). <br />Sven Gustafson with Stonewood, 153 Lake Street E, included a lengthy breakdown of thoughts on the <br />property and showed aerial photos of the property to explain. Mr. Gustafson noted what they are <br />requesting is very much in character with everything up and down the street. Two of the lots being <br />proposed are wider than 75% of the adjacent thirty homes on screen. He noted 75% of the lots are non- <br />conforming in one way or another and only 8 of the 30 lots are conforming in width and in area. The <br />Applicants are looking for feedback from the City Council. <br />Bonnie Martinson lives across the street and stated her biggest concern is the drainage issue. This will add <br />two more houses draining water into the street and across the road to the neighboring properties. Ms. <br />Martinson would like to suggest the Applicants put in a rain garden to collect water so it does not drain <br />across the street. She clarified the tennis court has a berm between it and the road so that water must stay <br />on the west side of the road. The Hartzell driveway is draining down the road. Ms. Martinson noted her <br />backyard is already being flooded from just an inch of rain and they really need to address the water that <br />is swamping them across the street. <br />Johnson understands the argument but the creation of a non-conforming lot in a new process has not been <br />supported in the past. <br />Mayor Walsh wonders what Pandora’s box they open by swapping it out and making one lot conforming <br />and the other non-conforming. <br />Printup is not very comfortable with the proposal and stated however this goes in the future a plan layout <br />for drainage is important. <br />Mr. Gustafson clarified the non-conformity is width and it will still be a non-conformity of width as there <br />is no way to make the lots conforming the way they are currently. They are rearranging things but not <br />making it any worse in any way. He asked if it would change the Council’s opinion if the non-conformity <br />on Lot 2 remained on that lot. He brought up Wildhurst noting he read through the documents and it went