My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-09-2022 City Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2020-2024
>
2022
>
05-09-2022 City Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/24/2022 11:50:15 AM
Creation date
5/24/2022 11:50:08 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br /> Monday,May 9,2022 <br /> 6:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT REPORT <br /> 15. LA22-000012—STONEWOOD LLC.,2987&3005 CASCO POINT ROAD AND PID 20- <br /> 117-23-34-0027, SKETCH PLAN <br /> Curtis stated the application is a sketch plan to create an additional lakeshore lot from the existing. The <br /> Applicant tis proposing to re-plat all three lots in the Hartzell Addition.The LL1C district dimensional <br /> minimums are V2 acre and 100 feet in width. In April the Planning Commission discussed the sketch plan <br /> and although no public hearing was held,members of the public did provide comment centering on <br /> existing drainage concerns on Casco Point Road and house locations on the properties; submitted <br /> comments are included in the packet. Since Planning Commission's review the Applicant's surveyor has <br /> reanalyzed the existing property dimensions and has determined that lot 2 is 97 feet wide at the 75 foot <br /> setback where 100 feet is required and is currently non-conforming.The Applicant is requesting informal <br /> feedback. Initially Staff did not support the proposal as there were no identified practical difficulties <br /> supporting the creation of a non-conforming lot where three conforming lots existed.The new <br /> information regarding the existing non-conformity of lot 2 changes the analysis.While there are two <br /> conforming lots and one non-conforming lots now,at the conclusion of this process there will be two <br /> conforming lots and one non-conforming. The non-conforming status is proposed to change from one lot <br /> (Lot 2)to another(Lot 3). <br /> Sven Gustafson with Stonewood, 153 Lake Street E,included a lengthy breakdown of thoughts on the <br /> property and showed aerial photos of the property to explain.Mr.Gustafson noted what they are <br /> requesting is very much in character with everything up and down the street.Two of the lots being <br /> proposed are wider than 75%of the adjacent thirty homes on screen. He noted 75%of the lots are non- <br /> conforming in one way or another and only 8 of the 30 lots are conforming in width and in area.The <br /> Applicants are looking for feedback from the City Council. <br /> Bonnie Martinson lives across the street and stated her biggest concern is the drainage issue.This will add <br /> two more houses draining water into the street and across the road to the neighboring properties.Ms. <br /> Martinson would like to suggest the Applicants put in a rain garden to collect water so it does not drain <br /> across the street. She clarified the tennis court has a berm between it and the road so that water must stay <br /> on the west side of the road. The Hartzell driveway is draining down the road.Ms. Martinson noted her <br /> backyard is already being flooded from just an inch of rain and they really need to address the water that <br /> is swamping them across the street. <br /> Johnson understands the argument but the creation of a non-conforming lot in a new process has not been <br /> supported in the past. <br /> Mayor Walsh wonders what Pandora's box they open by swapping it out and making one lot conforming <br /> and the other non-conforming. <br /> Printup is not very comfortable with the proposal and stated however this goes in the future a plan layout <br /> for drainage is important. <br /> Mr. Gustafson clarified the non-conformity is width and it will still be a non-conformity of width as there <br /> is no way to make the lots conforming the way they are currently. They are rearranging things but not <br /> making it any worse in any way. He asked if it would change the Council's opinion if the non-conformity <br /> on Lot 2 remained on that lot.He brought up Wildhurst noting he read through the documents and it went <br /> Page 4 of 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.