03-21-2022 Planning Commission Packet

Home Browse Search

PC Exhibit B PRACTICAL DIFFICULTIES DOCUMENTATION FORM LA22-000013 • 1. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the Zoning Chapter. Response: Yes, the new homeowners are currently taking steps to make this their forever home, but are strategically taking steps to better the property by remodeling the original interior and exterior details and finishes. In addition, the existing lower level heated porch w/ deck above are structurally failing and need much repair to be considered safe and feel repurposing these living spaces to the main level, while not getting any closet to the lake, will make for a more aesthetically pleasing structure and internal use. 2. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property not created by the landowner. Response: Yes, through discussions with the city and survey review, the new owners have found that because of the irregular shaped shoreline and the North homes relocation of a new home constructed 2000, created an average lake shore setback that would cut through the current home that once was found to be conforming when it was constructed in 1989. They have also determined that the existing porch and deck are not safe due to failing structural members from to long-term leaks and poor maintenance. 3. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Response: The approach were requesting is being done with the intention of bringing the spirit back to this site and so it can work harmoniously with the neighborhood's irregular shaped shoreland and rolling yard contours. Our intent is to add beauty to the already charming, yet eclectic, character found in the surrounding homes. We plan to update the existing home's exterior finishes that will blend seamlessly with our proposed addition. 4. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties if reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of the Zoning Chapter. Response: The variance request for this structure has nothing to do with an economic decision. It is based on ordinances changes due to homes around them that are dealing with an irregular shaped shoreland and new build locations changes. We have discussed our planned addition with the neighbors to the North and South and who collectively feel the thoughtful placement will not impair neighbor sightlines as these homes are orientated away from our home, as seen in aerial views. 5. Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 116].06, Subd. 2, when in harmony with this Chapter. Response: AGREE 6. The Board of Appeals and Adjustments or the Council may not permit as a variance any , use that is not allowed under this Chapter for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located.