|
, .., .� �: : � ... , ,... . ,..: : ..:; "` .:e'�•�r �t`R: �k�.a.�.sy.l.a'F r'd°Y9:r.�, .x..� n C"
<br /> �.,F.
<br /> > .: .�. n. .��� ' ,,,. . . r..,, .y
<br /> � :, � �� .�:�. . �.� .t- .�. . - ,w., �i�.
<br /> .. . . . . . , . .
<br /> ,�. . . ,., . . .� . . • .
<br /> ..
<br /> . .i: . . ,µ, ��� ..
<br /> . , . � . �.: ��'. . • . � .,. �
<br /> e•�; ��. .,��.i "a.i• i,. ..x�;� a Y. _ �:� ,A .�� .'Y
<br /> ,
<br /> �.',i . . . . ..
<br /> :
<br /> .,i� . . ��•.n.. „,.,. ; ...... . ... . . . . '. . ,_. . . . . .:
<br /> �' ,.... . .. � � . ..
<br /> �� MINUTES OF A PLANi�1ING CC�MISSION MEETP.VG I-�LD JANUARY 17, 1977 - PAGE 3
<br /> �. P'
<br /> (t �
<br /> '�'he Zoning Administrator informed the Commi.ssion that VICTC�RIA GRAIN C�ANY
<br /> �ry �i> applicant will be returning with new plans. The sketch of 500 NORTH ARM DRIVE
<br /> ` �t the revised plans included some change�s in the rr�:rsh land S(JBDIVISIOIV (PRELIMIIdARY)
<br /> �.;3 ��rimet�r which cauld .result in some problems. Dredging (#200)
<br /> has bees� eliminated in this revised proposal. Mr. Muhich
<br /> ' �� also stated t.hat the c�mtractor has called r�uesting that
<br /> a building pe:mit be i:�sued for Lot 6 of the revised
<br /> _ � proposed plat. Mr. D'iu�iich explained to him t}iat this is
<br /> , ;�� not permittec� prior to the filing of the plat. hir. Steve
<br /> r�, SJilensky of Brauer �, R<.�sociates t•�as present. He assured
<br /> �; , -the Commission that he ��ould submit revised plat shortly
<br /> so platting procedures could continue.
<br /> :� ;.�
<br /> _ r4cDon�ld moved, Dunlap seconded, to table this matte.r
<br /> tmtil the revised plan�: are submitted. Motion - Ayes (5) ,
<br /> `�
<br /> ,' Nays (0) ,
<br /> �;:.
<br /> , The Planning Commissiori discussed report prepared by Mr, JANIES McC
<br /> Niuhich and agreed with contents. Reports from other 3445 BAYSIDE ROAD
<br />— The C�munission N(x1-CONFORr4IiVG USE
<br /> ,: :, —
<br /> instructed Zoning Admiriistrator to�notify applicant to
<br /> - be present at ne.xt mee;:ing when the Planning Commission _
<br /> ,�ould tzke action on t�1is matter.
<br /> Ihmlap moved, Pesek seconded, to ��able this until the
<br /> next meeting. Motion - Ayes (5) , Nays (0) .
<br /> ` Ihznlap moved, Pesek seconded, to table this matter tmtil JACK RHODE
<br /> ` �:, applicant submits revised proposal. T4otion - Ayes (5) , 1410 BC�-INS POII1I' ROAD
<br /> ;.� NaJs (0) . VARIAr�t� - LO'I' ARF.A �,
<br /> jVI])TH - COi�IDITI0I�1L USE
<br /> PERMIT (#210)
<br /> Planning Cormnission was very concerned over discrepancy in ROBERT BIRKELAND
<br /> ; content of applicat;ion. Current application requests 1298 1VILI�-iURST TRt�IL
<br /> � �;�pr�val of dredging of a 50' channel supposedly approved R'�TI�'�1DS VARIANCE
<br /> in 1973, yet old ;�pplication and I�1R approval stipulates DREDGING PERI�IIT
<br /> y. a 25' channel. Nir. Birkeland was present and stated. that (#217)
<br /> ; he did not Irnow where the 25' width came from. His plans
<br /> �re to finish t}ie other half which was not completed
<br /> 4 several years ago, but not to make channel any wider than
<br /> pr�sently exists. This would involve dredging 25' dawn
<br /> the middle ama slope the sides. At the present time, he
<br /> cannot na.vigate his pontoon out through t}�e ;nouth of this
<br /> channel becr.�u.�e of the algae and weeds that have built up
<br /> c,1 tlie bottom.
<br /> DLmlap n�ved to recorrmend approval to open up closeu part
<br /> �� channel but not to extend over 25' bottom width
<br /> already dredged subject to engineer's approval.
<br /> ;,,
<br /> `:_ ��
<br />
|