Laserfiche WebLink
Site Visit <br /> SER ecologists examined the subject property for are s meeting jurisdictional wetland criteria <br /> during the site visit. One area meeting the jurisdiction 1 criteria of a wetland was flagged, and <br /> boundaries were determined and delineated. The appr ximate wetland boundary is outlined in <br /> yellow (Figure 5). At the request of the client and verb 1 approval of the LGU, only the subject <br /> wetland was delineated. Location of the boundary is n eded in order to accommodate a future <br /> driveway on the as two separate lots are involved ut which may be under two separate <br /> ownerships in the future. <br /> The NWI had previously identified the present wetland as PEMC. The wetland is a depressional <br /> wet meadow with an open pond area that is semi pe anently inundated on the east side. The <br /> open pond area was created by previous excavation and residual evidence of the sidecast spoil is <br /> evident on a recent aerial photo (Figure 5). <br /> The wetland of interest is located in the northern quarte of the parcel. The wetland vegetation in <br /> the seasonally inundated wetland was dominated re d canary grass (Phalaris ari�ndinacea <br /> FACW). The transition to upland can be marked vegeta ively, primarily as the reed canary grass <br /> disappears and the blue grass (Poa pratensis FAC) begi s on the north side and as the Canadian <br /> thistle(Cirsium arvense FACU) becomes prominent to t e south. <br /> Sample point SP 1-1 Wet was taken from the north end i the wetland. The soils at sample point <br /> SP1-1 Wet consisted of a silt loam at the surface beco ing a clay loam concentration matrix at <br /> 32 inches of depth. Hydric indicator Al2 (Thick Dark S rface) and F1 (Loamy Mucky Material) <br /> were present. The soils at sample point SP1-1 Upl co sisted of layers of loam, turning more <br /> sandy as depth increased.No hydric indicators were pre ent. <br /> Sample point SP1-2 Wet was taken from the south by s uth west end of the wetland. The soils at <br /> sample point SP1-2 Wet consisted of a silt loam at the s rface becoming a sandy loam depletion <br /> matrix at 12 inches of depth. Hydric indicator S7 (Dark urface) was present. The soils at sample <br /> point SP1-2 Upl consisted of layers of silt and sandy 1 am, turning to a loamy sandy as depth <br /> increased. No hydric indicators were present. <br /> Wetland hydrology was present at sample point P1-1 Wet with secondary indicators <br /> Geomorphic Position(D2) and FAC-Neutral Test(DS). etland hydrology was present at sample <br /> point SP1-1 Upl with secondary indicators Geomorph c Position (D2) and FAC-Neutral Test <br /> (DS). <br /> At sample point SP 1-2 Wet the secondary indicators D (Geomorphic Position) and DS (FAC- <br /> Neutral Test) were present. At sample point SP1-2 pl there was no primary or secondary <br /> indicators for wetland hydrology. <br /> A third sample point was taken in the center of the etland just to the south of the semi- <br /> permanently inundated pond on the east side of the p rcel. It appears that this area had been <br /> affected by sidecasting of dredged soil as the ponded a ea looks to be an excavated offshoot of <br /> the larger pond area to the east and off of the parcel. The vegetation here was dominated again by <br /> reed canarygrass (Phalaris ar-undinacea FACV� as ell as common milkweed (Asclepias <br /> Svoboda Ecological Resources 3 4245 Bayside Rd <br /> Project Number: 2013-021-03 Orono,MN <br />