|
wis
<br /> •
<br /> e'-'7=1'' � ,v,,,•ttt 4. .4 a ..,i;4'7,-'',,,': Als - r r $. of .;..
<br /> ‘-';'L,
<br /> f ,?1,1., 3�5 k '.' 3 'r; t f+ R4 + ,A •
<br /> ,yid [ r '* e r - v t. - S' r -,-.; r 1'u a t
<br /> .t . RK t� t A �}� C': 'h }tY; ,' y'• '-'41,&11'.17.-'t''' ''.-=
<br /> �1' A 5} '(51r - is
<br /> t zA"',. , I S i�r � Pa ,� "ry I' rt.. �r .k r '7 -
<br /> �,+ #� Sad'=- �y r�1 4 '' `, `fikie:S� ,, '' . i tte ° d' t f . }
<br /> � '-'-:-..-•`4='',��-.�� 1r, $r r4,a.�(,A keep' � � r��i-�" h`x�, ay_ * i r� ,.
<br /> '11 ,`L'17'4,-' •f iiitCt �"itv yf is )r ,� .y(? .xif "` D . xs 1
<br /> r ,' 0,,,,K3,1,:,,,` 'f: /. y+ -•. *, ''r '.+ ,r,t rt , T 41,0"1,-,4.!' ---„:�s -.• ,;;� � 'q �•
<br /> •Y t,;e ,• ,•-' f at .:5.' •ah.,, i'l ♦ IAV Ir ' M 44043 .t,.. b ..h .. ''' .. ,. �. �3 i
<br /> Cfl ry
<br /> .' 1. a B )
<br /> a R r*:'7/
<br /> AM 4i w.:s.ar11Jril 1tl, ] 9t]tl R. /w "-'1 �i) . • �,” -r a
<br /> aJ:.lmcr. Rivers (N539) � >
<br /> 1440 Shoreline Drive 0.. ., •t. t
<br /> Proposed Rczoninct
<br /> Page 4 '. s
<br /> •
<br /> t'rom a technical �.:tand1)oint, actor review of the site, the record
<br /> history, the use history and the comprehensive plan, your planner r
<br /> cannot make a recommendation either for or against the proposal.
<br /> On the one hand, the zoning record is clear and the use history is
<br /> ,t, such that any vestiges of co'umercial use. on any of the subject property
<br /> are clearly nun-conforming uses with no right to perpetuation.
<br /> a
<br /> ' �. On the other hand, t.h(- f:(' is obviously local sentiment to permit Windward
<br /> r
<br /> the clock reconstruction it desires. Modic,•, the zoning at this time
<br /> would not be contrary to the comprehensive plan. Most importantly, g
<br /> there it no physical demarcation point that: clearly defines residential
<br /> x. or commercial use in tile area and the aesthetics are similar Pio matter
<br /> -`T which proposal is followed.
<br /> jx
<br /> � '•:•• Therefore, it seems tom(' t.0 be a policy decision for the Council toY;0,,.g ' make without strong staff recommendation one way or the other. I dc'
<br /> �� � 4i think the Council should consider the following points: p
<br /> * y
<br /> } , .` 1 . Rezoning is a ver strong statement as to the Council 's real intent
<br /> -,1 1" for permanent use of the land. This is especially important on Tanager
<br /> Ik.. 'a!;a Lake. If the area is to be considered residential, it should not be
<br /> 4''1' rezoned.
<br /> ' t
<br /> 1# •
<br /> 4 s1 2. The option of a conditional. use permit would seem to be unavailable
<br /> - because the necessary f ind.ingrs would be a l lnust impossible to make. f
<br /> 415-:— 3. Rezoning of any of the property would horizontally increase the ,
<br /> LMCIJ' s definition of allowable dock u' c arca.
<br /> {` a
<br /> ',2 , -''.: 4 . The revised dock plan submitted by Mr. Rivers may he a "new" dock
<br /> ,, '; under LMCIJ reyu]ationt; which coup': then only ex..end 100 ft:. from shore,
<br /> : The proposal assumes 0 200 It. dock uso arca.
<br /> ( '5f-�
<br /> ;tit� 5. The only comprehensive planning consideration seems to be the baric
<br /> .1;1.-.4i,t one of indicating any comm rcial arca outside of the MUa7! line. The
<br /> •'....-:''' current lack of newer and other urban se'"t ices thus affects the existing
<br /> t3.-el'%"' 13-2 property als much ,I;; .i t tine t})i:, proh(+ , ll .
<br /> 1 6. No matter which option is followed, a proper subdivision of parcel ry,,
<br /> 2500 sy :,'.:Hers with application toshould1,( rotnplc, I'd bt the t:>rut t'rt [
<br /> aae �l1
<br /> and approval by t:hc !': ' ',', in emd r to cl, :It up the tax rt'ra,rds.
<br /> The tinri nn C orni i t 1. 't' ' 1 I-, ,. .:t , in, "1'i ,](v F 1 l cen'ic' including the
<br /> 4L1 iy'++�iv rev::3L( (]('1- l .3 .1)3,t. , /Id :id.' t . i ', • t l + 'ict l 11(! , ..'t.l tit' rl('C i ! l Ct...
<br /> T,,
<br /> `t47� N ,I 1: theL(-,Ti.ine l:, (it°f,l.• , ' H. : 'I (IU '., j'l,l: %,odld have to 'r(.',.'.'t1. tel the
<br /> " '�%im t i„( t ! 1ctfl wili h !te t.o Itc' (I;ade
<br /> ',+ ,� 1978 .layout. 1 t the . `,t;ln , i s i, pl o , t
<br /> '.10',. ', on 100 ft. v:•' . 200 ft . floc}. use ,t: r',1 and I ii1`rt .i f ter t_hc proposed 111.111
<br /> compared to :111 1.,1.1'Tt) ,,, ,,, � k •,tt:ri 1.t'1'!•,! f1.1II •,' .,l.;Mid rdfs.
<br /> 5-i. t-ai ..-
<br /> ': J� '. q:
<br /> y
<br /> ;5f;telt,_i v ,' ' .
<br />
|