|
<;, 1, I gE,I+4r+ ti. 'gig, .1 pfiv ry ' fix; ,' _x t .• `'�" q .
<br /> a
<br /> � ��+h.<r,..' a -:ir pG,w'�"r �1.E1,z.o*. ,.T,s �i t^y'+•ir'.��,,yr,'3�i i4:41:-'n- "�,,.,sw��•( �1;�s �_ 7 s �->. �.� n�;yt om;-�^varAvp,Fwt°., „�� �.
<br /> ,�1• #' yr}* , .xp{.,rr ! ...n r i 'Kx,,xf+ i r •3•:.' t d:1. i 1 �' Y J� -'` r.
<br /> i . .• ,^"' , � c'� r -.�,gii�fa ',1,..-,..,..
<br /> ,...x .z�,v f�', ,,a'' '14 4 �.«t- ,'4Wmay, , 5., a�'+' �:''°" ! e '?'0,-14.:- 'p•�f ` -
<br /> Aq`� rt .N x•2:^r MIP tr:,- `rtryr •; `,i• 0,,Y t,,,,,-..;,'";1;:4"i.,aT '4'1'.-.'41k.'5'' 4`• `
<br /> i � t` ,�i vt
<br /> �t A t 7!rt Y c Icy*,r4r, �) �,l f 7 '"tet' !� T 2.47 r
<br /> Atkir.
<br /> h1• ?� xa 9t�p�'# �' ,yam Alt., '�f 7r aqm-^d�,a t3 t4y u, ,':.e- w44 v u4 $�}�y�'X' sA ¢ �° r 9�a 4.i 4���.'r�t+ u '
<br /> � 1 . �53:� .3`14. .•{,. ;.!h, . , .t �5' f'`... >']N Y k i
<br /> 0:1,, �d"r t ¢ 6 }'1' �y'Sy �` .,.Ut.�n«�+� ���•�''wl- �+ �.i .1.,
<br /> y! a
<br /> R).r. , ....1 't.
<br /> iC
<br /> . a' April 1 10, 1 (.ttiO ..�-1 U ,i
<br /> James Rivers (#5 39) / 14..
<br /> 1440 Shoreline Drive
<br /> Proposed Rezoning 17
<br /> Page 4
<br /> From a technical 'standpoint, after review of the site, the record
<br /> history; the use history and the comprehensive plan, your planner
<br /> cannot make a recommendation either for or against the proposal.
<br /> On the one hand, the zoning record is clear and the use history is
<br /> such that any vestiges of commercial use on any of the subject property _
<br /> are clearly non-conforming uses with no right to perpetuation.
<br /> On the other hand, there in obviously local sentiment to permit Windward
<br /> the clock reconstruction it desires. Mo.rin•; the zoning at this time
<br /> "` would not be contrary to the comprehensive plan. Move importantly,
<br /> there is no physical demarcation point: that: clearly defines residential P
<br /> �r:_ or commercial use in the area and the aesthetics are similar no matter
<br /> - :i:-. which proposal is followed. 1
<br /> rte -
<br /> Therefore, it seems to me to be a policy decision for the Council to �'
<br /> make without strong staff recommendation one way or the other. I do G
<br /> �j;` think the Council should consider the following points:
<br /> 7,4 , � e
<br /> :
<br /> ,q4
<br /> , ( • , 1 . Rezoning is a ver.}' strong statement as to the Council 's real intent r,
<br /> 0" for permanent use of the land. This is especially important on Tanager
<br /> ,, 4 Lake. If the area is to be considered residential, it should not be
<br /> tf%'• rezoned. r
<br /> r „�,,.e 2. The option of a conditional use permit would seem to be unavailable
<br /> " because the necessary findings would be almost impossible to make.
<br /> N4 3. Rezoning of any of the property would horizontally increase the
<br /> '` LMCU'a definition of allowable dock use area.
<br /> z 4. The revised dock plan submitted by Mr. Rivers may be a "new" clock
<br /> ---47',,4,Y3„-t?..$. under 7,t1CD regulation:; which could then only r_r.,_r_nd 100 ft.. from shore.
<br /> ;, -. ; The proposal assumes .t " 00 f dock u:;. are >
<br /> ',1,".1„":'2:1,A A.
<br /> 1
<br /> 5. The only comprehensive !planning consioerat.jon seems to be the baric
<br /> (rr�1' one of indicating any commercial area outride of the MUST+ line. The
<br /> 1,;;;;:r.
<br /> z current lack of sewer ami other urban sf,•+'vt'ces thus affects the existing
<br /> t, k,r -2 property a s much a:; 1 t door this pfopo.sal .
<br /> t < l3 !
<br /> +` 6. No which o r ion i:: followed aparcel
<br /> tV4xq� a matter }� . proper subdivision of
<br /> ' Vii'
<br /> . -4 2500 should be completed by the property owners , with application to r
<br /> P '" and approval by the CH '.', in (.,trho. (.r, cl,•.1! up the tax re'cr,rdn.
<br /> '1 *,,, The Piarina (,'n+:.1 i t t '(` !, 1- ,'+ t :i' 1 ins, . 0P( lt,r•t 1 ioen!ic' i ndl ti+i 1 rl(1 the
<br /> IX.
<br /> w' rev, :e,•rl (lock .! ,'.'( :1! , . r:, :i•.: 1 ,J'i t t•. : ,.n(! I ( ., t' ( �,•
<br /> r 11 + Jl l tl lr C i !
<br /> 'rtv ..i 1f the .!()ti 1.11,i 1:, (111t 1, , , ' I;' 1 rt:• IJ,'(, l.r.. ';:(101 (1 ll.aVI' t(r re"•'!'t 1. t(+ t.)1C
<br /> , 19711 layout. t ! the . 1 1 i. ! .'+':.
<br /> '.4.7,-- t- A��, .'i 1 : :i;••'t t, I, .I rl+'( `ion will. hl'.Vl' t to b4' made�i on 100 ft. vs . 201) f 1. . tdoci. u:..• area :11!11 t :. r' .t , lt'!' the proposed i'lru:
<br /> ( '. ',i,,,syr comparod to all 1,!•1(1) . , tbark a.:(! 1,(•t"ii toar,•r• ::I.:In:}il!"dl:.
<br /> I F. t,°
<br /> .
<br /> R'.y`tif av,..
<br /> �+`•.y6,at ,- {� -C3<c- --e,-16..,
<br /> 2 r tm _+ -,t N. A.,--v#. 1
<br /> 1r. +!F' 1�. Y -3'p_�M' {, �:ti r, -e?t'ra '•; "�4 „'Ssr,�,,, : , .. 1 F'�, h 1". r ' t�
<br /> ''7 �: ? W:,w.�,s._ .�,..-.Ic .f.�HS. si»'.1:1w°S.M.<:� t'��3✓.-. ,r. �x r,.?"` �,� : :xn "t . r-,sst.� �.,.1.zt,'. .� »� ,., ..� �2; �� :;5 p.
<br />
|