Laserfiche WebLink
• <br /> approved <br /> That on January 15, 1980, the Council the <br /> final plat of Chapman Addition per Resolution 1102 . That <br /> resolution advised, in the conditions of approval section, that <br /> Lot 2, Block 1, Chapman Addition was riparian to Lake Minnetonka . <br /> See Exhibit E. <br /> 10. That since approximately 1985, I have received phone <br /> calls questioning the existence of riparian rights for an interior <br /> lot. The phones calls that I received were made by persons who <br /> identified themselves as being directly involved in the sale and <br /> purchase of the interior lot, including real estate agents for <br /> both the seller and buyer as well as interested buyers . I <br /> consistently advised the callers that the Chapman Addition was a <br /> recent plat approved per standards for lakeshore development and <br /> noted that according to the Council ' s Resolution, only the <br /> lakeshore lot was to have riparian rights . I also advised that <br /> the City would not grant a building permit to the owners of the <br /> interior lot for the construction of a dock on the lakeshore lot, <br /> owned by Chapman, pursuant to §10.02 of the City Ordinance Code <br /> which provides that accessory structures, such as docks, can only <br /> serve the principal structure on the lot on which the accessory <br /> structure is built. <br /> 11. That I told the telephone callers that the pertinent <br /> documents relating to the riparian rights in questions were <br /> available for their review in the City offices and that the files <br /> would be made available during city hours . <br /> 12. That the persons involved in the sale and purchase of <br /> the interior lot knew, prior to the April, 1986 sale to <br /> -3- <br />