My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-22-2022 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2022
>
02-22-2022 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/23/2022 9:07:45 AM
Creation date
2/23/2022 8:36:28 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
185
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
FILE#LA22-000002 <br /> February 22,2022 <br /> Page 2 of 2 <br /> RR-1B Requirements West Lot East Lot <br /> Width 200 feet 100 feet 100 feet <br /> Area 2 acres,87,120 sq ft 0.16 acres, 0.16 acres, <br /> 14,008 sqft 13,991 sqft <br /> Setbacks <br /> Front yard 50 feet 50 feet 50 feet <br /> Side street 30 feet 20 feet 20 feet <br /> Side yard 30 feet 15 feet 15 feet <br /> Rear 50 feet 40 feet 40 feet <br /> Lot width is measured at the front building setback line. Frontage along Minnetonka Ave would <br /> be considered the side street. <br /> Applicable Regulations: <br /> Section 78-420 outlines the development standards for the RR-1B zoning district. <br /> Section 82-85 outlines the purpose and process for sketch plans. <br /> Analysis: <br /> The proposal is not consistent with the zoning code or the Comprehensive Plan. The current <br /> zoning, RR-1B, requires 2 acres of gross land area, and 200 feet of frontage. The property cannot <br /> be split without variances, and the applicant must prove practical difficulties. <br /> The current zoning of the property is consistent with the community management plan, Urban <br /> Low Density Residential, which requires 0.5—2 units per acre. 0.5 units per acre is a 2 acre lot, <br /> consistent with the current zoning. Lot sizes at 14,000 sq. ft. equate to about 3 units per acre, <br /> consistent with an Urban Medium Density Residential Land Use. <br /> Public Comments <br /> To date, no public comments have been received. <br /> Issues for Consideration <br /> 1. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? <br /> Planning Staff Recommendation <br /> Planning Staff does not support the subdivision as proposed. <br /> List of Exhibits <br /> Exhibit A. Application <br /> Exhibit B. Proposed sketch plan <br /> Exhibit C. Staff review comments <br /> Exhibit D. Pre-application correspondence <br /> Exhibit E. Resolution 1798 <br /> Exhibit F. Resolution 5888 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.