Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br /> Tuesday,January 18,2022 <br /> 6:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> per car using them. In the case of both Summit Beach and Lowry Woods,the Council is going out of its <br /> way to go against the expressly-stated intent of the original land owners who donated land to Orono's <br /> care and preservation. They are bending over backwards to negate the basic contract of these properties, <br /> to violate the trust inherent in those land donations without any clear or apparent universal benefit to the <br /> citizens of Orono.That is not meeting a fiduciary responsibility. It is not preserving the environment. It is <br /> not to use the land in a manner intended in the donation. It only benefits a private organization with <br /> relatively small membership that often do not even live here. In the 2020 letters noting the for and against <br /> in the City's materials,of the 99 people who had registered themselves only 5 people were for this <br /> development who were also residents or Orono or Long Lake and also not members. 5%had no vested <br /> interest and still wanted this development to continue. In looking at LLRC's website it says they have <br /> benefitted up to 400 people. If one took only 7,000 residents of Orono not counting Long Lake, <br /> understanding that roughly half of all the people that benefit from the LLRC's business are actually <br /> residents,it means this company only benefits about 3.5%of the residents of Orono.This is also an issue <br /> that does not need such a fix.The LLRC can easily continue where they are in the commercial part of the <br /> lake,can secure and cover their equipment if they are so worried,and can house their equipment for the <br /> winter somewhere that is not on public property. There is no real problem needing a solution,no clear <br /> benefit to the majority of citizens,but there are clearly identifiable problems for the environment,for <br /> precedent,and for land-use originally intended by the land owners for something else.Human behavior <br /> just does not take those factors and give away the land for no good reason.That prompts the serious <br /> question of just what exactly is the Council gaining in exchange for these land giveaways because it is <br /> clearly not the general public of Orono that is gaining enough benefit to make this a clear or rational <br /> decision. <br /> Barbara Schmidt,50 Landmark Drive,read a letter: <br /> Dear Planning Commission, <br /> I am known as the "tree lady."I am the taxpayer that has been busy out trying to keep a local sports team <br /> off my private property and out of Bederwood, Big Woods, and the Lowry Woods Nature Conservation <br /> Area. Sound familiar? That is because it is nearly the same scenario as tonight. Someone in our City <br /> government hands over a piece of public property for development without including the neighbors or <br /> constituents in the process. Sound familiar? Orono public land is being taken for private gain. It is either <br /> being given away to become a personal asset or for private development, neither of which give all <br /> constituents access or benefit. In fact in most cases the constituents lose access to Lake Minnetonka and <br /> natural areas without any meaningful chance to be heard at all. Out of the hundreds of people I've met <br /> and the thousands of people I've heard on social media, no one wants Summit Beach to go to a single <br /> niche private activity. Not one person wants to lose this natural area as it is today to become a private <br /> club house.As our very own Mayor Dennis Walsh has said,preserving and maintaining Orono's open <br /> space is a priority that we cannot afford not to protect and keep maintained because once you lose it you <br /> never go back. When asked what are the most pressing issues for Orono, Councilmember Richard Crosby <br /> said: residential building growth while preserving open spaces and a historic feel for Orono. From <br /> Councilmember Victoria Seals:when looking at development in Orono, I, along with the City Council <br /> should look to the community and make sure our decisions not only fall in line with the laws in place but <br /> also with what the greater public wants. So now our City Council has taken a 180 degree turn and <br /> supports a private, niche sports team to dominate a favorite public beach. Summit Beach land value is <br /> somewhere worth between$2-2.5 million dollars on a conservative day. Where is the financial benefit for <br /> the public to give away their land? What does the average person gain?Please vote to table this for <br /> further input, table it so the environmental assessment can be done, table it because you work for us, the <br /> Page 6 of 11 <br />