Laserfiche WebLink
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br /> MINUTES FOR JUNE 22, 1998 <br /> (#15) Robert and Julie Hanning-Request for an Agreement Related to a Future Subdivision at <br /> 4220 Sixth Avenue North -continued <br /> Gaffron suggested the Hannings file an application and get an answer before the hearing on <br /> September 23rd. <br /> Mrs. Hanning stated she would like some action by the City Council on this matter. <br /> Radio noted a motion was not necessary or appropriate at this time. <br /> Mayor Jabbour directed City Staff to draft a letter to the Hannings stating the facts, noting <br /> that the property line for the second lot is undesirable according to Orono ordinances and causes <br /> other concerns for the first lot. <br /> (#16) REVISED RESOLUTION REGARDING THE RELEASE OF THE TAX <br /> FORFEITED PARCEL AT 1960 SHORELINE DRIVE -RESOLUTION NO. 4105 <br /> Moorse stated the resolution has been amended regarding the release of the tax forfeited <br /> parcel at 1960 Shoreline Drive to reflect the City Council's wishes that the outstanding <br /> special assessments on the property be waived and that the tax forfeited parcel be allowed <br /> to remain a separate parcel, subject to a covenant being placed on the parcel prohibiting the <br /> parcel from being a buildable lot. <br /> Mayor Jabbour expressed concern that the building should be condemned and torn down due <br /> to public safety issues. Kelley indicated he also was in favor of that. <br /> Gaffron noted the petroleum tanks were removed 10 or 15 years ago. <br /> Kelley inquired what impact this has had on the sewer in the area. Mayor Jabbour stated <br /> the sewer was disconnected and capped on behalf of the owner. <br /> Tom Radio recommended the City Council add the condition that the property owner waive any <br /> right to object to a hazardous building procedure with the costs being assessed against <br /> the property owner. <br /> Flint commented that it should be made clear that the City is not condemning the land but <br /> the building. <br /> Goetten stated she would be in favor of condemning the building but not the land. <br /> 18 <br />