Laserfiche WebLink
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br /> MINUTES FOR JUNE 22, 1998 <br /> Mayor/Council Report-continued <br /> Kelley remarked that increases for the Long Lake Fire Department pension plan were approved <br /> without City Council approval,noting that 80%of the budget is derived from Orono, and suggested <br /> that the Fire Department notify the City Council before future financial decisions are finalized. <br /> Mayor Jabbour suggested that perhaps the City Council should meet with the Long Lake City <br /> Council to discuss financial issues related to both the Police and Fire Departments. <br /> Kelley suggested that a prioritized list be comprised by the City Administrator every two weeks with <br /> the current projects being listed along with a time schedule to help the City Council keep current on <br /> the projects and to ensure that future needs are being addressed adequately. <br /> Goetten indicated she would like to be updated at least once a month on the various street <br /> improvement projects that are currently underway. <br /> Gappa indicated he could have the Public Works Department review traffic counts on <br /> County Road 15 to determine if traffic lights are warranted. <br /> Kellogg noted that County Road 15 should remain at the same elevation as previously, with <br /> the County Road 6 project on schedule. Concerning Ferndale, Plymouth has drafted an <br /> agreement which will be discussed at the meeting on June 29th. <br /> ENGINEER REPORT <br /> Mayor Jabbour inquired about the status of the Edgewood Hills sewer project. <br /> Kellogg stated the project, particularly the directional borings, is being rebid. <br /> CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT <br /> (#15) ROBERT AND JULIE HANNING -REQUEST FOR AN AGREEMENT <br /> RELATED TO A FUTURE SUBDIVISION AT 4220 SIXTH AVENUE NORTH <br /> Moorse stated the Hannings had expressed concern that the County Road 6 project would <br /> reduce the area of their property below the amount needed to be able to create a second lot <br /> in the future because of the right-of-way acquisition. The Council had previously indicated <br /> that it would consider entering into an agreement with the Hannings to maintain the ability to <br /> create a second lot if the lot area was reduced below the required amount. <br /> 16 <br />