Laserfiche WebLink
possibility of system use being discontinued if certain parameters, set by the City, are not met. <br /> The permit will also contain the frequency of reporting to the City. The City will not be <br /> responsible for monitoring performance systems. It will be the responsibility of the homeowner <br /> to monitor their system within the boundaries set by the City. The operating permit would be <br /> valid in five year increments. The homeowner will need to renew the operating permit every five <br /> years. If the operating permit is not renewed, use of the septic system must be discontinued. <br /> This operating permit( or something else?) needs to be recorded on the property deed. New <br /> homeowners will need to follow the same regulations as the previous homeowner. This will also <br /> prevent "surprises" for any new homeowner. <br /> Public Education <br /> It will also be the responsibility of the LGU to provide consumer information to the public. The <br /> information needed will include estimated costs for construction, operation, monitoring, service, <br /> component replacement and system management. Information will also need to be provided <br /> regarding the anticipated system life. It is also the responsibility of the LGU to make <br /> information available to the public regarding hydraulic and organic loading rates to the <br /> absorption area in relation to flow amounts. <br /> Pro's & Con's of Performance Systems <br /> There is going to be a vast change in the way septic systems are going to be designed and used <br /> over the next few years. I see merits to using performance systems. One is that now a <br /> performance septic system may be able to be used in places where only holding tanks could go <br /> before. Also, using a performance system could reduce the number of mound systems being <br /> installed in Orono. The only reason I see this being a benefit is that most homeowners don't want <br /> the hump" in their yard. In no way am I saying mound systems do not work properly. It would <br /> just be a good public relations move. <br /> On the other hand, performance systems are probably going to cost more than a standard system. <br /> A performance system is going to need constant monitoring. The homeowner will be required to <br /> monitor the septic system and keep the City informed on how it is functioning. I foresee a <br /> homeowner doing this for a short period of time and basically become tired of doing the constant <br /> monitoring. Another problem is going to be the operating permit. The operating permit will <br /> need to state that if the septic system does not meet certain criteria set by the City, the use of the <br /> system will need to be discontinued. It will be very difficult for a home to just stop using the <br /> septic system. It will also be very difficult for the City to force a homeowner to discontinue use <br /> of the septic system. I foresee enforcement regarding compliance reports being very difficult. <br /> I will be attending classes in November and December regarding these new performance <br /> systems. After attending these classes, I will have more definitive information. <br /> Council Action Requested <br /> Staff recommends that council schedule a work session to discuss the potential merits and <br /> pitfalls of adopting state code provisions for the use of performance systems. <br />