My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Hanning Subdivision Possibilities
Orono
>
Property Files
>
Street Address
>
W
>
Watertown Road
>
4300 Watertown Road - 31-118-23-13-0013
>
Correspondence
>
Co Rd 6 Upgrade-Condemnations (1. Hanning 2. Johnson)
>
Hanning Subdivision Possibilities
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/22/2023 4:29:18 PM
Creation date
1/21/2022 3:44:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
x Address Old
House Number
4300
Street Name
Watertown
Street Type
Road
Address
4300 Watertown Road
Document Type
Correspondence
PIN
3111823130013
Supplemental fields
ProcessedPID
Updated
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
146
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br /> MINUTES FOR MAY 26, 1998 <br /> (#22) County Road 6 Right-Of-Way Acquisition and Robert and Julie Hanning Subdivision <br /> Plan at 4220 Sixth Avenue North - continued <br /> Jabbour suggested Hanning work with staff and come back to the next Council meeting on June <br /> 8 with a better plan. Gaffron should find out from the County exactly what will be taken for <br /> right-of-way. <br /> Hanning asked if a park fee would have to be paid if he subdivided now. Jabbour responded that <br /> the maximum would be $4,900 for the additional unit. Gaffron explained that if the value of the <br /> second parcel is $61,000 or more, the maximum amount is $4,900 for the park fee. <br /> (#23) REQUESTS BY THE ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER RELATED TO THE <br /> ACQUISITION OF THE TAX FORFEIT PROPERTY AT 1960 SHORELINE DRIVE <br /> Moorse explained that Mr. Crear, owner of the property at 1980 Spates Avenue, would like to <br /> purchase the tax forfeit parcel at 1960 Shoreline Drive. Council waived the sewer assessment <br /> by resolution when the parcel was released for sale to adjacent property owners, based on the fact <br /> that the lot would not be buildable. An additional special assessment of approximately $5,000 <br /> was discovered that is related to legal fees incurred in the review of a planning application from <br /> a prior owner. The City was successful in fighting the application but was unable to collect the <br /> cost from the prior owner. Mr. Crear is asking to have this assessment forgiven. <br /> Crear added that he could not combine the tax forfeit parcel with his homestead propertybecause <br /> u <br /> the mortgage company wouldn't allow it. Moorse suggested a covenant be drawn up to address <br /> the issue. <br /> Kelley asked what Crear planned to do with the tax forfeit parcel. Crear responded that he <br /> planned to plant trees. He added that the University of Minnesota was interested in using the <br /> property as a test site for bio-remediation and how chemicals react with the soil. <br /> Kelley asked how Crear intended to block the road noise as the building currently provides a <br /> buffer. Crear responded that the existing fence would not be removed until something was built <br /> to take its place. Kelley asked for a sketch plan from Crear and stakes showing the property <br /> lines. Crear noted that Hennepin County was going to take a portion of the property. <br /> 26 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.