Laserfiche WebLink
CONCLUSION <br /> • The Order for Judgment and Judgment of the trial court in this matter is based upon legal <br /> and factual determinations that are incorrect. The highest and best use of the property in <br /> question does not permit development as six lots as proposed by Respondents. The qualifying <br /> r <br /> language of Ordinance 172 precludes such development and Respondents have not invested <br /> sufficiently in developing the property to have a vested right in developing the lots as platted. <br /> • This Court should reverse the trial court's legal determination in this matter and remand this case <br /> to the trial court to properly value the property taken. <br /> Respectfully submitted, <br /> • <br /> AMY KLOBUCHAR <br /> Henne•in County Attorney <br /> ,41110 <br /> By: � , <br /> Mik Li7111". Berg (12080 ') <br /> Assistant County Attorney <br /> Attorneys for County of Hennepin <br /> A2000 Government Center <br /> Minneapolis, MN 55487 <br /> Telephone: (612) 348-8574 <br /> FAX No: (612) 348-8299 <br /> Dated: /Q , (O Q <br /> • <br /> • <br />• <br />• 4 <br />