Laserfiche WebLink
�oNo, Second appearance at Park Comm. Exhibit 0 <br /> t x PARK COMMISSION AGENDA ITEM <br /> F��kfsflUa'� <br /> • Item No.: 2 Date: March 2°d,2020 <br /> Item Description: Proposal for Boathouse in Summit Beach Park <br /> Presenter: Long Lake Rowing Crew Agenda Chairman's Report <br /> Section: <br /> 1. Purpose.The purpose of this action is to get a Park Commission recommendation on whether the city <br /> should partner with the Long Lake Rowing Crew allowing the club to construct and maintain a boat house <br /> and docks at Summit Beach Park. <br /> 2. Background. Long Lake Rowing Crew(LLRC)was founded in 2014 for the sport of rowing on <br /> Long Lake. LLRC has been operating out of the Birches site and the Long Lake Fire Department. <br /> However the Birches site is not ideally suited to launching boats and the club is looking for a place to <br /> construct a boathouse. The Club approached the City in 2018 about the possibility of partnering with the <br /> city for use of the Summit Beach Park location. LLRC is a non-profit,501C#organization. The mission <br /> of Long Lake Rowing Crew is "to provide a safe, inspiring and educational opportunity for people of all <br /> ages to learn, enjoy and excel in the sport of rowing. LLRC is a volunteer-driven, non-profit club <br /> committed to knowledgeable instruction,personal and competitive achievement, and the well-being of its <br /> members and the greater Long Lake community." The Parks commission considered this proposal at the <br /> November 4th,2019 Park Commission meeting at which time the Commission tabled the action(Minutes <br /> at Exhibit B). <br /> 3. Proposal. The LLRC will provide a presentation to the Commission on their proposal. In general <br /> • improvements at the park would include a boathouse,public restrooms and a dock system. <br /> 4. Considerations. The Commission should consider the following. <br /> a. Does the proposal enhance or detract from the use of the park? <br /> b. What benefits would the proposal provide to the park;to the community? <br /> c. What costs if any would be incurred by the city? <br /> d. What requirements(accessibility to public,park improvements,public programs)does the <br /> commission recommend the City council consider imposing on the applicants plan? <br /> e. What restrictions(size of structures,location of structures,hours of use,parking)does the <br /> commission recommend the City council consider imposing on the applicants plan? <br /> 5. Public Comment. At the November 4",2019 commission meeting the Commission received public <br /> comment. The minutes of that meeting including the public comment are at exhibit B. Written public <br /> comments received after the meeting are at exhibit C. <br /> 6. Way Forward. <br /> a. Park Commission review and recommendation <br /> b. City Council review. <br /> c. Planning and Zoning Staff Review <br /> d. Planning commission Review—If required(i.e.Variances needed) <br /> e. Agreement/Lease developed <br /> f. City Council Approval <br /> g. Building permit process <br /> h. Construction <br /> • <br /> i:_ <br /> Prepared By. , Reviewed By: - Approved By: • <br />