My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-08-2021 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2021
>
03-08-2021 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/14/2022 10:40:34 AM
Creation date
1/14/2022 10:23:36 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
490
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
January 20, 2021 <br />7.“The Board or Council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two- <br />family dwelling.” <br />Not applicable to this application. <br />8.“The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or <br />immediately adjoining property.” <br />a.Non-Conforming: The property is non-conforming lot under the R1-A district Lot area <br />requirements. The property is .53 acres vs the required 1.0 acres. The lot width at the <br />front setback line is 127.95 vs the required 140 ft. <br />The R1-A district front (35 ft), side (10 ft) and back yard (30 ft) setbacks are currently <br />conforming. However, the setbacks are all over proportioned to the actual lot area by <br />almost double relative to a conforming lot area requirement of 1.0 acre. If the setbacks <br />were proportional to actual lot size, they would be 18.55 ft (front), 5.3 ft (side) and 15.9 ft <br />(rear) <br />b.Excessive Structure Setback: The home was built 69.5 ft from the front property line. It <br />exceeds the minimum 35 ft front yard setback by an additional 34.5 ft. This significantly <br />reduces the usable rear yard depth by 34.5 ft, an area greater than 5,000+ sq ft. <br />c.Structure Layout and Placement: The property is a wedge shape with the front property <br />line 107.73 ft and the rear property line 208.42 ft. The home was not built aligned with <br />nor perpendicular to any property boundary AND the garage was located on the side of <br />the home with the longest side property line. The result is the nonliving portion of the <br />home (i.e. the garage) has substantially more rear yard depth and area than that on the <br />living side. <br />9.“The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which said land is <br />located.” <br />Other homes in the district may have one or two similar peculiarities included above, no home has <br />all three aspects. <br />10.“The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial <br />property right of the applicant.” <br />A customary and normally sized screen porch with views of their rear yard is a substantial <br />property right for a nonconforming ½+ dry acre parcel. <br />11.“The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort, morals, or in <br />any other respect be contrary to the intent of the Zoning Code.” <br />A screen porch is in no manner contrary to the intent of the zoning code. <br />Page 3 of 8
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.