Laserfiche WebLink
Narrative Explanation of Variance Request <br />I am the owner of the property at 1825 Lakeside Trail, Orono. I am looking to construct a <br />home for my family on the property. For most other properties on Long Lake, this would not be <br />a problem. However, there are several distinctive characteristics affecting my property that <br />preclude building a home without a variance. Specifically, the character of the lake shoreline, <br />the distance of the neighboring home (770 Brown Rd.) from the lake, the vacancy of the other <br />neighboring property (1875 Lakeside Trail), and the creek that runs long the North side of my <br />property, all combine to create practical difficulties in building a home on my property. <br />During the approval of the Willow Bay Sanctuary development, there was discussion of <br />setting an average lakeshore setback (ALS) line for my property and for 1875 Lakeside Trail, <br />because these properties would not be buildable under a literal interpretation of the ALS rule. <br />For some reason, this proposed ALS line (labeled on the attached survey as Expected ALS line as <br />shown on the preliminary plat), was omitted from the final development agreement. This <br />omission was only recently discovered, which necessitates my application for a variance. In the <br />meantime, an addition has been added to the home at 770 Brown Rd. There is a line included <br />on the attached survey label Expected ALS line per recent deck at 770, which illustrates how the <br />addition at 770 Brown Rd affects the Expected ALS line from the preliminary plat. The location <br />of my proposed home is conforming to this ALS line. <br />The ALS requirement is intended to prevent any one property owner from building <br />much closer to the lake than the adjacent homes, and thus negatively impacting the other <br />property owners’ ability to enjoy the use of their property and the lake. For most properties on <br />Long Lake this results in a reasonable setback. In this specific case, the ALS for my property is <br />based solely on the adjacent home at 770 Brown Rd., which is 343 feet from the lake at its <br />nearest point. The lake shoreline then curves in on the other adjacent property at the currently <br />vacant 1875 Lakeside Trail. Thus, a verbatim interpretation of the average setback rule results <br />in a line that cuts diagonally across my property. This ALS line renders the vast majority of my <br />lot unbuildable when combined with the 75 foot setback from the creek that winds through the <br />woods between my proposed home and 770 Brown Rd. <br />Council Exhibit G