My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-08-2021 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2021
>
03-08-2021 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/14/2022 10:40:34 AM
Creation date
1/14/2022 10:23:36 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
490
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />Tuesday, February 16, 2021 <br />6:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Page 2 of 2 <br /> <br />Barnhart replied in the affirmative and said the Applicant is also requesting a boundary line adjustment <br />for a portion of the property that is City owned, which is typically an administrative action on part of the <br />City Staff. They would basically move the boundary line from here down to here, so they would have <br />lake frontage the width and breadth of their lot. <br /> <br />Ressler opened the public hearing at 6:26 p.m. <br /> <br />Ressler closed the public hearing at 6:26 p.m. <br /> <br />Ressler said this seems to be pretty similar to some of the other vacations they have seen that the City <br />Council seems to be in support of. He does not see anything unique that would drive the Planning <br />Commission in a different direction. <br /> <br />Barnhart agrees and noted this is actually different than the others; the others actually provide lake access <br />from a public way to the lake. This one is parallel, essentially, to the shoreline and does not provide any <br />connection and is a pretty cut-and-dried case from a Staff perspective. <br /> <br />Ressler agrees and asked if any of the Commissioners are opposed. <br /> <br />McCutcheon said it seems that they are righting a wrong as the Applicant is paying the taxes, it is right in <br />front of their property and he thinks it makes good sense. <br /> <br />Kirchner moved, Gettman seconded, to approve LA20-000075, 1121 North Arm Drive, Vacation, as <br />applied. VOTE: Ayes 6, Nays 0. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.