My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-08-2021 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2021
>
03-08-2021 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/14/2022 10:40:34 AM
Creation date
1/14/2022 10:23:36 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
490
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />CITY OF ORONO <br />RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> <br />NO. ________________________ <br /> <br /> <br />3 <br /> <br />a. The property owner in question proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner, <br />however, the proposed use is not permitted by the official controls. <br /> <br />The request to permit portions of a deck lakeward of the average lakeshore <br />setback appears to be reasonable; the linear shoreline and location of the <br />neighboring homes result in the existing non-conforming condition. The Owner has <br />proposed hardcover removals to offset the new additions. <br /> <br />b. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property not created <br />by the landowner. <br /> <br />The location of the existing home, the orientation of the mostly straight shoreline, <br />and location of the neighboring homes, driveway easement, and existing <br />hardcover are conditions not created by the landowner; <br /> <br />c. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality.” <br /> <br />It does not appear that the requested average lakeshore setback variance to <br />permit a new deck on the lakeside of the home will adversely impact views of the <br />lake currently enjoyed by the adjacent property owners or alter the character of <br />the locality. Further, the Owner’s proposed hardcover removals will offset the new <br />hardcover resulting from the deck. <br /> <br />4. “Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties.” Economic <br />considerations have not been a factor in the variance approval determination. <br /> <br />5. “Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight <br />for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as <br />defined in Minn. Stat. § 216C.06, subd. 2, when in harmony with Orono City Code Chapter <br />78.” This condition is not applicable. <br /> <br />6. “The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under <br />Orono City Code Chapter 78 for property in the zone where the affected person's land is <br />located.” This condition is not applicable, as a deck is an allowed use in the LR-1B District. <br /> <br />7. “The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling <br />as a two-family dwelling.” This condition is not applicable. <br /> <br />8. “The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such <br />property or immediately adjoining property.” The location of the existing improvements/ <br />home, the location of the neighboring homes in line with the Owner’s home along the
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.