Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, February 22, 2021 <br />6:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Page 8 of 10 <br /> <br />10. BIG ISLAND DECLARATION AND CHANGE ORDER APPROVAL – Continued <br /> <br />they are taking another batch of state money, this time through the Office of Management and Budget <br />through the Department of Economic Development’s deed to Orono. The property, in order to get that <br />bond finalized, requires similar restrictions. Basically the state says they are giving Orono this money <br />and they want to make sure they do not take the money, improve the property, and sell the property for a <br />purpose other than what the money was given for. It is basically saying Orono will keep the property <br />long-term and it will remain a public park for the benefit of the public. <br /> <br />Attorney Mattick said that is it, they are taking money and in return Orono does not get to sell it until it is <br />run past the state. He noted there are a lot of restrictions on that property even before this one. <br /> <br />Johnson moved, Crosby seconded, to approve Big Island Declaration attached in Exhibit A; the <br />Change Order No. 4 for the extended ADA Trail in Exhibit B; and the associated engineering <br />proposal from BMI in Exhibit C. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br /> <br />PLANNING DEPARTMENT REPORT <br /> <br />15. LA20-000048 – TIMOTHY WHITTEN O/B/O I. JACOBS/ A. JACOBS REVOCABLE <br />TRUST, 1700 SHORELINE DRIVE, PRELIMINARY PLAT – RESOLUTION <br /> <br />Barnhart stated at the last Council meeting, he was directed to draft a resolution of approval for the plat of <br />Shoreline Estates; he has done so. The City Council added three conditions in addition to those Barnhart <br />originally proposed. Those were incorporated into the conditions of the document and he summarized <br />those in his background memo. Staff is recommending approval of the preliminary plat as part of that <br />resolution. Since the meeting they have received some additional commentary from the neighboring <br />property owner, and that has been provided to the Council. <br /> <br />Walsh said at the last Council meeting they approved the recommendation with the changes and they <br />really wanted some feedback from Hennepin County about the left-hand turn lane going to the east, which <br />they did receive. It confirmed that the City’s understanding is that the County would not recommend it <br />based on a number of factors and that was what the City was waiting on. He said they are not looking for <br />any additional comments at this point, as this is a preliminary plat. <br /> <br />Crosby said it was the turn lane and what else. <br /> <br />Walsh said it was just the turn lane they were looking for feedback on. <br /> <br />Johnson said with that turn lane, does it go without saying that it has to occur without an encroachment. <br /> <br />Attorney Mattick replied yes, there is no right for the Applicant to do anything on the Burwell property. <br /> <br />Walsh stated any private property. <br /> <br />Attorney Mattick said that is right. <br /> <br /> <br />