Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, October 26, 2020 <br />6:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Page 3 of 7 <br /> <br />There were no public comments. <br /> <br />Mayor Walsh closed the public hearing at 6:18 p.m. <br /> <br />Walsh moved, Johnson seconded, to adopt the attached Resolution providing for the certification of <br />delinquent 2020 water and sewer utility charges, recycling program fees, on-site sewage treatment <br />program, storm water charges to Hennepin County for collection of the 2021 Property Taxes. <br />VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. <br /> <br />PLANNING DEPARTMENT REPORT <br /> <br />8. LA19-000048 – TIMOTHY WHITTEN O/B/O IRWIN JACOBS 2018 REV TRUST, 1700 <br />SHORELINE DRIVE PRELIMINARY PLAT <br /> <br />Mayor Walsh noted the Applicant has requested to table the measure, and asked if anyone would like to <br />come up and discuss. <br /> <br />Meredith Kuhlman, 1760 Shoreline Drive, lives west of the proposed development. She noted her father <br />purchased the estate years ago, and it was made into three lots and the Kuhlmans decided to move to <br />Orono because of the great schools and sprawling location. Ms. Kuhlman and her husband watched the <br />last Council meeting and noted Mr. Whitten said he had talked to the neighbors about the development <br />and that many are on board. She said they had not been approached or talked about the development at <br />all and that the original average lakeshore setback (ALS) proposed affected the Kuhlman’s sightline to the <br />lake. Ms. Kuhlman said they object to 5-7 houses being built, even though they will be beautiful, because <br />if they had wanted to invest in a house in a neighborhood, they would have moved to Edina. She noted <br />they tried to be very respectful of neighbors when they built their home and set it back into a hill. The <br />fact that this development will be so densely populated is concerning and increasing traffic on Shoreline <br />Drive adds to that. Ms. Kuhlman understands development of some sort will potentially be at the site, but <br />noted the density of the current proposal as well as the fact that the communication hasn’t been forthright <br />and neighborly. <br /> <br />Carolyn Nelson, 1780 Shoreline Drive, lives next to the Kuhlmans; she noted three proposed houses are <br />so close to the wetlands and she thinks it would be unfortunate if they were built there as there is not <br />much of a setback. Ms. Nelson also noted they have trouble on the driveway and the developer better <br />make sure the roads are wide enough to accommodate two delivery trucks passing one another. She <br />believes they are crowding more houses into the space than they ought to. <br /> <br />Bob Nelson, 1780 Shoreline Drive, said he doesn’t see why a variance should be granted as the <br />developers know what the rules are and there doesn’t seem to be a reason for the Council to grant a <br />variance. <br /> <br />Barbara Burwell, 1100 Millston Road, is the property owner of 1125 and 1075 Shoreline Drive. She <br />stated she appreciates the Councilmembers service to the community. Today she feels sad as they have <br />already talked about the density and proposal but there have been some changes that have upset her. She <br />is not for this subdivision with 7 lots and she understands there is a new proposal which she knows <br />nothing about. She was offered the opportunity to walk the property with the staking of three houses and <br />said it was very helpful but she did not see anything regarding the road, or Lots 4-7. On October 16, 2020 <br />she was notified that the stakes were in place for the road and lots and went to the property on October 21, <br />5 <br />5