My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-09-2020 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2020
>
11-09-2020 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/14/2022 10:21:01 AM
Creation date
1/14/2022 10:06:50 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
301
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
FILE #LA20-000022 <br />21 September 2020 <br />Page 9 of 10 <br /> <br />lighting or glare resulting from the grading project; the applicant shall be advised of <br />the lighting requirement regarding the home and detached garage; and <br /> <br />15) Not detrimental to the public health, public safety, or general welfare. The grading <br />project will be monitored by the MCWD, the City Engineer and planning staff so as <br />to minimize nuisances during the project. Staff believes this criterion is met. <br /> <br />A CUP may be granted subject to such conditions as the Council may prescribe. Additionally, <br />a CUP shall remain in effect as long as the conditions imposed by the City Council are <br />observed, but nothing in this section shall prevent the city from enacting or amending official <br />controls to change the status of conditional uses. <br /> <br />Public Comments <br />To date, no public comments have been received. <br /> <br />Issues for Consideration <br />1. Does the Planning Commission find that that the property owner proposes to use the <br />property in a reasonable manner which is not permitted by an official control? <br />2. Does the Planning Commission find that the variances, if granted, will not alter the <br />essential character of the neighborhood? <br />3. Does the Commission find it necessary to impose conditions in order to mitigate the <br />impacts created by the granting of the requested variances? <br />4. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? <br /> <br />Planning Staff Recommendation <br />Planning Staff recommends approval. The applicant has demonstrated practical difficulties to <br />support the requested lot area, lot width, setback and hardcover variances without generating <br />neighborhood opposition. The FEMA and City floodplain requirement for a 15-foot elevation <br />bench around the home should be achieved, as there is adequate space on the property and the <br />grading plan can be modified to conform. <br /> <br />The proposed landscape plan offers additional infiltration opportunities offsetting the hardcover <br />and structure placed within the 75-foot setback. They have satisfied the criteria for approval of <br />both of the requested conditional use permits. A covenant should be signed by the property <br />owners relating to the plumbing within the detached garage. A haul route will be required with <br />the building permit. <br /> <br />The Staff analysis has indicated or assumed a number of updates or revisions to the plans as <br />submitted. The Planning Commission could table action to allow for review, or if comfortable <br />with the level of detail provided for the current review, could provide a recommendation to the <br />City Council. <br /> <br />Regardless of Planning Commission action, prior to City Council review the applicant shall <br />provide updated civil and architectural plans in addition to the required certificate of survey, <br />and documentation from the MCWD showing approval of the floodplain mitigation plan. <br /> <br />199 <br />199
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.