Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />CITY OF ORONO <br />RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> <br />NO. ________________________ <br /> <br /> <br />3 <br /> <br /> <br />4. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Economic <br />considerations have not been a factor in the variance approval determination. <br />5. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight <br />for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as <br />defined in Minn. Stat. § 216C.06, subd. 2, when in harmony with Orono City Code Chapter <br />78. This condition is not applicable. <br />6. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under <br />Orono City Code Chapter 78 for property in the zone where the affected person's land is <br />located. This condition is not applicable, as the use for a residential home is an <br />allowed conditional use in the LR-1B District. <br />7. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling <br />as a two-family dwelling. This condition is not applicable. <br />8. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such <br />property or immediately adjoining property. The home currently sits within the setback <br />and the addition is not going to change the setback from the lake. <br />9. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which the <br />land is located. The proposed addition will not change the current setbacks from the <br />lake and meets all other zoning setback requirements. The location of the existing <br />home is unique. <br />10. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a <br />substantial property right of the applicant. The existing home can be re-built in kind, <br />the proposed addition is necessary to permit the property owners continued <br />enjoyment of their property. The addition is located in a location which serves the <br />intent and goals of the ordinance by minimizing visual impacts to the lake. <br />11. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort or <br />morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of this chapter. The proposed <br />project will not impair the health, safety, comfort, or morals of the public. <br />12. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but <br />is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty. Granting of the variance will resolve <br />and alleviate a demonstrated practical difficulty. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS: <br /> <br /> Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants a <br />variance to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Section 78-1279 to allow an average lakeshore <br />setback, subject to the following conditions: <br /> <br />1. Council approval is based on the entire record, above Findings. <br />139 <br />139