My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-13-2020 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2020
>
07-13-2020 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/14/2022 10:05:02 AM
Creation date
1/14/2022 9:59:23 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
239
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />Monday, June 15, 2020 <br />6:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br /> <br />LA20-000039 JOHN & SHERRY GORMAN, 3585 FREDERICK STREET, VARIANCE, 6:34 <br />P.M. - 6:50 P.M. <br /> <br />Sherry Gorman, Applicant, was present. <br /> <br />Staff presented a summary of packet information. <br /> <br />Ms. Sherry Gorman, 3585 Frederick Street, said she and her husband bought the house 11 years ago. <br />When they were looking for a house on the lake, they were not looking for a pool, although this house did <br />have a pool, which has its own significant hardcover requirements. They loved that the house sits on a <br />hill, the view is amazing, it is on the far end of Carman Bay, and has a southern exposure. They saw the <br />size of the house being relatively small to be able to still fit their needs as they moved into retirement. She <br />stated there are several things that make the lot unique, one of which is the lot itself is a triangle. They <br />own 23 feet at the lake and 130 feet by the street. Their house is built up on the hillside which requires <br />retaining walls, sidewalks, and walkways. The driveway is very long and loops around in a circle. A <br />couple of things that make the house unique is that it was built in 1966, when most families were one-car <br />families. It is currently a two-car garage. It also has limitations in terms of the ceiling height in the garage. <br />The back half is only six feet and nine inches and the front half is only nine feet, so it does not allow for a <br />lot of storage. Their practical difficulty is the lack of storage. They have a need to store patio furniture, <br />ladders, and paddleboards. They currently rent a storage unit at Metro Storage in Spring Park for $200 a <br />month/$2,400 a year. It is not the dollar amount that is prohibitive. However, each year they have to rent a <br />truck, go to and from the storage unit 3-4 times. They load up the cart, pull the cart to the truck, load up <br />the truck, drive home, unload the truck, and carry it to the back yard. The bottom line is, they are getting <br />kind of old. She referenced the plan for the three-car garage and said they would basically lay it on top of <br />the current driveway and would give back the rest of the leg of the driveway so they can reduce their <br />hardcover, which was over when they purchased the house. She referenced a close-up view of the six-nine <br />area of the garage and said they are looking for that area to be the area for the new storage unit. They <br />would wall off the area with the six-nine ceiling, put their patio furniture there, and add a backdoor access <br />to be able to carry things to and from the backyard. The three-car garage would sit on top of what the <br />current driveway is today. She discussed the elevation drawing. She said on the neighbor’s side they tried <br />to make it appealing to them by adding rock all the way around to make it look consistent with the front <br />of the house and then add unique windows, etc., in the back so it did not look like they were adding a wall <br />that would be facing them. Their neighbors have indicated they are very pleased with what they see. She <br />stated they would do some things with landscaping as well. She referenced the existing hardcover <br />calculations displayed and the loop driveway. She indicated they are at 34.3% existing today and the <br />proposed hardcover is putting the three-car garage on the driveway and taking off the leg, which is a little <br />over 1,000 square feet of hardcover, taking them down to 29.62%. She noted the current hardcover is <br />34.4% and proposed hardcover is 29.4%, a reduction of 5%. Orono has the ruling of 25%, and they are <br />still over what they are supposed to be and are asking for a variance of 4.4%. They are hoping the <br />Commissioners can view it from the standpoint that they are decreasing their hardcover and also <br />increasing the property value of the house by adding the three-car garage. They think they are improving <br />the street appeal of the house. For their neighbors, it will help because then they will not have to put <br />anything extra outside on the lawn or driveway. She thanked the Commissioners for their consideration. <br /> <br />Chair Ressler opened the public hearing at 6:43 p.m. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.