My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-27-2020 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2020
>
04-27-2020 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/13/2022 11:05:44 AM
Creation date
1/13/2022 10:48:10 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
239
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, April 13, 2020 <br />6:03 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Page 10 of 25 <br /> <br />Crosby stated he thought the infrastructure should be done first and the toilet would be a major thing. <br /> <br />Seals asked Edwards if the price was for a bathroom at the Visitor Center or up on the hill for Action B. <br /> <br />Edwards said the bids solicited were for a bathroom by the Visitor Center. <br /> <br />Walsh said it is 40-50 yards away so it should not be too different. <br /> <br />Edwards stated during the solicitation process a lot of bidders had questions about the installation of the <br />vault toilet and a lot of concerns about how to move that mass of material into place on an island with <br />limitations of barges, cranes, etc. Another big concern would be trying to maintain a vault toilet on top of <br />the outlook, as it presents a lot of unique logistical challenges, including dragging a septic hose through a <br />protected wilderness area on the island, which he is not even sure the watershed would let the City do. He <br />knows they can install and maintain a toilet at the Visitor Center. <br /> <br />Mr. Rick Carter, 2780 Shadywood Road, a Big Island Legacy Board member and Park Commission <br />member, said he would love to see the City go with Option A so they could max out the grant and have <br />the shelter as well as the bathroom. He would be grateful for Option B and would hate to do less than that <br />and leave more money on the table. They will continue to raise funds and hope to get enough money to <br />take advantage of the remaining $28,000 of the grant. They would like to see the infrastructure, the trails, <br />Visitor Center, and bathroom in place. They are anxious to see it go forward. <br /> <br />Printup asked what the grant deadline would be. <br /> <br />Walsh answered that the money needs to be spent by next April. <br /> <br />Seals said she is going in the middle of the road. There was talk about the City giving the 501(c)(3) a <br />loan, but she does not think it is a good plan because from what she knows, there is nothing to hold a <br />501(c)(3) to a loan. It would also seem unusual for a non-profit to pay back a City on a loan and is a <br />harder ask. Her priority is to improve the trails. She thinks if the bid was for the toilet by the Visitor <br />Center, the City should stick with that plan, as Change Orders cost a lot of money. She is 100% sure the <br />watershed does not want the City dragging a “poop” line through their nature preserve. She likes the <br />location of the toilet as bid because it is open and you can see it from the water. There are also cameras <br />there and it is a nice, safe area. In the past people have destroyed things out there, and she feels better <br />about the bathroom being there. If everything works out perfectly and the watershed is willing to have a <br />septic line drug through the nature preserve, the City can build a second toilet, assuming the money is <br />raised. <br /> <br />Crosby stated he agreed with Seals as far as the toilet location because vandalism will happen, and it <br />makes sense to try to prevent it. He is leaning towards Plan B. <br /> <br />Johnson said he does not think it is a park without a bathroom. The question is, can the bathroom survive <br />on the island. Having it closer to the dock and the entrance will help with visibility. He stated the question <br />that needs to be answered is what kind of commitment can the City get out of the fundraising group. He <br />indicated the City is prepared to contribute what they pledged in the beginning. The only variable that has <br />changed is how much money the group has been able to raise to this point, when the City has to make a <br />decision. He is leaning towards Action B. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.