Laserfiche WebLink
o <br />O O CITY of ORONO <br />3 t, <br />RESOLUTION OF,. HE CITY COUNCILf` , <br />G' NO. <br />kESH g' <br />3.The Planning Commission reviewed this application at a public hearing held on <br />September 17, 2012 and recommended conditional approval of the variances <br />based on the following findings: <br />a. The Property contains 11,443 square feet (0.26 acre) in area and has 51 feet <br />in width at the OHWL and 47 feet in width at the 75-foot lake setback. <br />b. Sanitary sewer is available. <br />c. There is no additional land available to bring the lot ar a or lot width into <br />conformity. <br />d. At 24.9% of the gross lot area the Appficants' proposal conforms to the <br />hardcover limitations for a Tier 1 lot. <br />e. The topography and shape of the Property creates a practical difficulty for <br />locating the home in a conforming location. <br />f. The Property widens from the street to the lake. In order to meet the 10 foot <br />setback from the east lot line the house will be angled so that at its ciosest <br />point it will be 7.6 feet from the west side street lot line and as it appraaches <br />the fake will mset a 10 foot side street setback. <br />g. An existing retaining wall along the east property line is proposed to remain, <br />but will be buried and a swale will be created on top of the filled area. <br />h. To address the steepness of the lot a French drain is proposed across the <br />driveway which will drain along the east, side lot line toward the lake. <br />i. Retaining walls are proposed within 5 feet of both the east and west sides of <br />the lot which will facilitate the construction of the new home and alleviate <br />grading concerns. Engineered p{ans will be required if the walls exceed 4 feet <br />in height. <br />j. The Planning Commission finds that a 5-foot deck setback from the alley <br />would be more appropriate than the 3.5 foot setback proposed, and <br />recommends that a 5-foot setback be required. <br />k. The Applicants' request will alfeviate a praetical difficulty inherent to the <br />Property and not created by the Applicants. <br />Page 2 of 5