Laserfiche WebLink
Revised 05/18/2018 <br /> <br /> <br />Shoreland Amendment Checklist <br /> <br /> <br />Local Government to Complete DNR Informal & Conditional Approval Review DNR Final <br />Approval <br />Review <br />A. <br />Provisions being <br />modified, deleted, <br />or added. <br /> <br />Local Government <br />Ordinance Citation <br />and brief description <br />or title. <br />B. <br />Shoreland <br />Model <br />Ordinance <br />Citation <br />C. <br />Local Government Comments <br /> <br />For each provision that has been modified, deleted, or added, briefly explain <br />why. <br />D. <br />DNR Determination of Compliance <br />with Minimum Standards <br /> <br />Place an “X” in the relevant column <br />when determination made. Place a <br />“?” in the relevant column for <br />provisions that need clarification. <br />When clarification received, delete <br />the “?,” place an “X” in the relevant <br />column. <br /> <br />E. <br />DNR Review Comments <br /> <br />• If a proposed provision is missing, not applicable, or has been modified and is acceptable (marked with a <br />“N/A” or “meets” in column D), briefly explain why in this column. <br />• If a provision is marked “Below” in Column D, address as a “red” comment in the proposed amendment <br />and place a “” in Column F. <br />• If a provision marked “Below in Column D, is part of an implementation flexibility agreement, write <br />“offset per term of implementation flexibility agreement” in this column and place a “” in Column F. <br />• If a proposed provision is marked with a “Higher” in Column D, acknowledge as a higher standard as a <br />“green” comment in the proposed ordinance, and explain why it is a higher standard in this column. <br />F. <br />Conditions of <br />Approval <br /> <br />Place a “” <br />for conditions <br />of final <br />approval. <br />G. <br />Verification <br /> <br />Place a “” for <br />conditions that <br />have been <br />met. Only <br />verify for <br />items that <br />have been “” <br />in column F. <br />Meets Below Higher N/A <br />78-1220 Amended the list of impacted zoning districts ☐ ☐ <br />78-1277 Aligned the sections of code that pertain to duplexes ☐ ☐ <br />78-1279 Shore setback is a defined term, we capitalized it throughout. ☐ ☐ <br />78-1283 3.72 Required a Professional Engineer to do grading plans in the steep <br />slope areas <br /> ☐ ☐ <br />78-1285 8.2 Added replacement standards for trees removed ☐ ☐ <br />78-1286 (a), (b),(d), <br />(e), (f) 8.32 Moved the grading and land alteration related standards to the <br />grading and land alteration section of the code. <br /> ☐ ☐ <br />78-1292 Added a notation that Interim use Standards may apply, for <br />clarity <br /> ☐ ☐ <br />78-1292 (b) Buildings have a stricter setback than structures, in Orono ☐ ☐ <br />>>>>>>>>> The following standards are not found in the “Shoreland regulations” chapter, <br />but incorporate them from our current ordinance. ☐ ☐ <br />78-1592 8.32 Outlines what requires a permit ☐ ☐ <br />78-1593 (A) 8.33 Outlines the standards for issuance ☐ ☐ <br />78-1593 (A) (2) 8.33 Adds state rules related to grading ☐ ☐ <br />78-1593 (A) (5) 8.33(b)(7) Prohibits full in bluff impact zones, unless approved by City <br />engineer for a slope stabilization project. <br /> ☐ ☐ <br />78-1593 (8) Introduces haul route standards, which is a local issue. ☐ ☐ <br />78-1726 (a)(4) 8.32 Introduces activities that require an Interim Use Permit, some of <br />these activities are in the Shoreland Overlay district <br /> <br />78-1726 (a)(6) Introduces an emergency repair exception for slope failures <br /> <br /> <br /> To be filled out by DNR: <br />DNR Staff Reviewing for conditional approval: Date review finished: <br />DNR Staff Reviewing for final approval: Date review finished: <br />DNR Staff Reviewing for higher standards: Date review finished: