Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, February 24, 20 20 <br />6 :00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Page 6 of 15 <br /> <br />bollards in the trail area, removing the bollards for the summer season and putting them in for the winter <br />season. The restroom would be a one -seat vault toilet and would be ADA compliant. The shade structure <br />being installed is a very simple design, using concrete or steel to make them as vandalism-proof as <br />possible. There would be a mix of regular and ADA picnic tables, again installing something that is fairly <br />indestructible/vandal-proof and using squared-off boulders for the seating. <br /> <br />Edwards explained the cost estimates for work that needs to go out on bid, the work that can be done by <br />City forces, and the administration and engineering costs. The total project currently is $526,000. The <br />item estimates are conservative; a ten percent contingency was added to cover that. Once they get bids in, <br />they will have a better idea of costs. He noted the costs are higher than previous estimates and funding <br />goals. He indicated there was $80,000 allocated from the park dedication funds, which is the City’s <br />contribution to the project. They are looking for $120,000 from the Big Island Legacy Foundation and <br />$200,000 from the DNR grant, which is a matching grant from the 120 and the 80, to come up with <br />$400,000. The consulting firm Bolton & Menk has donated $10,000 towards the project, which will come <br />out of project oversight costs. <br /> <br />Walsh asked if the $10,000 amount could go towards the match. <br /> <br />Edwards indicated it could, but only ten percent of the overall cost can be in the form of engineering and <br />administrative costs. With $400,000, they can have $40,000 worth of administrative costs be associated in <br />either the match or the grant dollars. They have $78,000 of administrative and design costs. <br /> <br />Edwards said he is proposing to go out for bids in the next few weeks and bid the project with alternates, <br />meaning everything will be bid on but bid separately. That allows the City to go through the bids and <br />accept the base bid but say they don't have the funding available for the alternates or maybe only one or <br />two of the alternates. The base bid would be all the things associated with the trails and signs. Alternate A <br />would be for the vault toilet, and alternate B would be for the picnic structure and associated tables. That <br />would allow for options at award time based on funding. <br /> <br />Walsh and Crosby indicated that made sense to them. <br /> <br />Edwards said he would like to get an award approved at the end of March/beginning of April. <br /> <br />Johnson asked if there were two vault toilets in the plan. <br /> <br />Edwards said when they did the master plan, they identified locations for two potential toilets. As the <br />design became more defined, they made a decision to put only one in the bid based on costs. <br /> <br />Johnson commented the vault toilet next to the lake welcomes it to be kind of a public restroom versus <br />one up in the lookout area, because if you’re using the facility there, it’s because you're using the trail. <br /> <br />Johnson referenced the gates that would be used to keep snowmobiles off the trail and asked if it wo uld <br />still be accessible to people that want to hike or ride their bike. <br /> <br />Walsh indicated the gates are predominantly to restrict vehicles and snowmobiles. <br /> <br />Edwards said that is why they want the bollards to be removable, to make it more welcoming in the <br />summertime. The bollards would be spaced 36 inches apart, which is plenty of width to walk and cross -