My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-09-2020 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2020
>
03-09-2020 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/12/2022 3:29:35 PM
Creation date
1/12/2022 3:23:57 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
225
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, February 24, 20 20 <br />6 :00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Page 10 of 15 <br /> <br />Edwards said this is the final step the City owes the State of Minnesota to get the grant money. <br /> <br />Johnson stated he does not see a reason not to agree to sign it now if the City is not exposing themselves <br />to any new restrictions. <br /> <br />Walsh said the City would hold off from recording it until the final bids come in and final decisions. <br /> <br />Johnson moved, Crosby seconded, to approve Big Island Park ADA Trail Project (19 -033) Pre -bid <br />Design but not to sign the document until the final bids and bid alternates come in, the final budget <br />is complete, and final decisions are made. VOTE: Ayes 3, Nays 0. <br /> <br />PLANNING DEPARTMENT REPORT <br /> <br />9. LA19 -000101 – AL AZAD, 200 BEDERWOOD ROAD, LOT AREA - RESOLUTION <br /> <br />Staff presented a summary of packet information. <br /> <br />Walsh said he understood the sewer line was done in the '90s. <br /> <br />Oaken agreed with his statement. <br /> <br />Walsh noted it was PVC, up to code, roughly ten feet deep based on the plans, and asked whether the City <br />installed those lines and if the prope rty owners were assessed. <br /> <br />Edwards stated it was a City project and that he believed the property owners were assessed. <br /> <br />Walsh said the City knows the plans were good and the City did the work and knows the depth. Mr. Azad <br />indicated he would be glad to give the neighbors an easement. He did not see anything holding the City <br />back as far as approval with the contingency that an easement is in place with the neighbors. <br /> <br />Johnson asked if the City has heard from the neighbors. <br /> <br />Crosby, Johnson, and Walsh discussed that they had seen the neighbors once or twice at either City <br />Council or Planning Commission meetings. <br /> <br />Walsh stated the neighbor's big issue was wanting to know the depth and the ability to have access if there <br />was a problem. He said this is the City's chance to rectify an issue that didn't get taken care of in the '90s. <br /> <br />Johnson referenced the Planning Department's recommendation which said the applicant could be <br />required to field locate, confirm the depth, and then protect the service line where t he proposed driveway <br />crosses if it is less than 6.5 feet. <br /> <br />Oaken indicated that was a comment from the analysis, which could be done to verify or ensure the <br />service line. <br /> <br />Walsh stated they found out the City did the project and plans and are going off t he plans and saying they <br />know how deep it is. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.