Laserfiche WebLink
AGENDA ITEM <br />Prepared By: mcc Reviewed By: J. Barnhart Approved By: <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />1. Purpose. This application is regarding after-the-fact variances to permit as-constructed <br />improvements within the lake and average lakeshore setbacks. <br /> <br />2. MN§15.99 Application Deadline. The application was received on January 10, 2020 <br />and was considered to be complete on January 23, 2020. The 60-Day review period has <br />been extended and now expires on May 22, 2020. <br /> <br />3. Background/ Summary. A variance for a new home (File #17-3965) was granted in <br />2017, and a building permit consistent with the approvals was issued in January 2018. In <br />October 2019, the builder submitted an as-built survey and requested a final Certificate of <br />Occupancy. Upon inspection it was noted that unpermitted changes were made to the <br />existing boathouse and a new deck had been installed replacing a deck shown as to be <br />removed to offset hardcover. The deck was not shown on the submitted as-built survey. <br /> <br />The boathouse is situated 16.5 feet from the ordinary high water level and is entirely <br />within the average lakeshore setback. It is considered to be a legal non-conforming <br />building. It can be rebuilt in-kind, but expansions to the footprint and/or volume of the <br />building are not permitted without variance(s). Additionally, the new ±240 square foot <br />lakeside deck was not rebuilt in-kind and not accounted for in the hardcover calculations; <br />the hardcover now exceeds the approved level. <br /> <br />4. Planning Commission Vote and Comment. On February 18th, the Planning <br />Commission held a public hearing. Following the public hearing the Planning <br />Commission voted 5 to 1 (Erickson) on a motion to recommend denial of the after-the- <br />fact variances. <br /> <br />There appeared to be support for the cosmetic changes which do not result in expansions <br />to the height, footprint, or lakeward extent of the non-conforming boathouse. There also <br />appeared to be support of allowing a minimal landing from the boathouse door to connect <br />to the dock. The dissenting Commissioner supported the request as submitted. <br /> <br />5. Public Comment. There was neighbor testimony during the public hearing in support of <br />the aesthetic changes. <br /> <br />6. Revised Plans. Based on the Planning Commission and staff feedback, the applicant has <br />provided a revised plan which modifies the lakeside deck area, attached as Exhibit C. <br />This plan reflects a reduction in hardcover from the original after-the-fact variance <br />request, but results in a 32 square foot increase above the approved variance level. <br /> <br />Item No.: 14 Date: March 9, 2020 <br />Item Description: LA20-000005 – Gordon James Construction o/b/o David & <br />Lynn Gutermuth 2665 Casco Point Road, After-the-Fact Variances <br />Presenter: Melanie Curtis <br />Planner <br />Agenda <br />Section: <br />Planning Department <br />Report