My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-27-2020 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2020
>
07-27-2020 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/12/2022 3:03:26 PM
Creation date
1/12/2022 2:56:21 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
349
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, July 13, 2020 <br />6:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Page 13 of 19 <br /> <br />Walsh stated he did not recall. He noted there are four docks in the area where the one dock is visible, <br />having just been in the area around the 4th of July. <br /> <br />Johnson asked if the shed has always been there. He said someone called in about the docks and said they <br />were being rented and was questioning the shed. He indicated everyone received an email the previous <br />day titled “Comments on sketch plan,” although Staff was not included on it. <br /> <br />Walsh and Crosby stated their email did not download. <br /> <br />Johnson said they could ask the Applicant about that. He asked where the cul-de-sac was on the photo <br />being displayed. <br /> <br />Staff indicated the area of the cul-de-sac on the displayed photo. <br /> <br />Crosby asked where the proposed house would be. <br /> <br />Rief indicated the areas where the two houses would be on the displayed photo. <br /> <br />Johnson said that was all he needed because he was at the property earlier and was not sure where they <br />were talking about. <br /> <br />Mr. Frederick Puzak, 1340 Baldur Park Road, a resident for 27 years, said the question is, what to do with <br />an acre of land. Lots 21-27, which has a cabin built in 1900 that would be removed, contain over an acre <br />of land above the 929.4 ordinary high-water level. Less than 5% of the land is wetland. The proposal <br />provides for two building sites on an acre of land in the spirit of the ½-acre zoning. They put in a la rge <br />cul-de-sac in order to make Staff happy which takes up some of the lot area. Because the topography rises <br />as it goes to the northwest, the cul-de-sac has to be kept on Lot 27 because it cannot be built on a slope. <br />Otherwise, access to the higher ground will be too steep. The architect, Gronberg, has two possible well- <br />spaced home sites with over 100 feet between them and the neighbor to the east. The original builder was <br />looking for more density. Per recommendation by the Council/Planning Commission, the density has <br />been reduced to two dwelling units per acre, though some of it is cul-de-sac. He has not spoken to anyone <br />in the neighborhood who is in favor of the cul -de-sac. If that is what City Staff wants, that is what is being <br />proposed. He does not want it to look like Bloomington or Brooklyn Park, this is Baldur Park, but that is <br />the compromise he is making to try to make a long-needed terminus to Baldur Park Road and to put some <br />lots on underutilized land that were platted 120 years ago for cabins. He said many of the lots to the east <br />on Baldur Park Road are 50 -foot lots and in a floodplain. There is some floodplain on the property but it <br />is not wetland. It has been professionally delineated, and the delineation shows that less than 5% of the <br />property is wetland. He tried to make compromises and keep everybody happy and thinks Mr. Gronberg <br />has come up with a very viable, creative solution. He is hoping the Council finds it merits approval. <br /> <br />Johnson asked if there were two sets of docks. <br /> <br />Mr. Puzak said there are docks at the cabin. There are also docks associated with the house farther up the <br />hill. They are both accessory uses to the existing structure on Lot 25. The docks will go away if the <br />proposal is approved. <br /> <br />Walsh asked if Mr. Puzak was renting th e docks. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.