My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-27-2020 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2020
>
07-27-2020 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/12/2022 3:03:26 PM
Creation date
1/12/2022 2:56:21 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
349
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, July 13, 2020 <br />6:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Page 11 of 19 <br /> <br /> <br />Barnhart clarified that he told them to not do anything they do not have a permit for. <br />Walsh indicated Barnhart basically said that was a yes. <br /> <br />Barnhart said he wanted to be careful because “stop work” is an order and he did not do that because they <br />had permission to do work. <br /> <br />Johnson noted that Staff gave the owner the appropriate advice, which is to not do any work they have not <br />been approved to do. <br /> <br />Barnhart agreed with Johnson. <br /> <br />Johnson stated the owner did it anyway. <br /> <br />Walsh said they could approve it but with a note-to-self that there may need to be more conversation <br />about it. <br /> <br />Johnson indicated there were 11 note-to-selfs on this one. <br /> <br />Crosby stated there are two separate projects going and they cannot be confused. He does not know if <br />there has been that many on this particular project. <br /> <br />Walsh asked if this is the Dunkley property. <br /> <br />Crosby clarified that this is the Vogstrom property and the two should not be put together because they <br />are two different projects. He did not think there were that many passes on the Vogstrom property. <br /> <br />Seals stated there have been enough. <br /> <br />Crosby said he does not want the Council to stand on the hill to prove themselves right. The “I’ve got to <br />be right” phrase does not do much for him. <br /> <br />Seals stated if someone were to look at the amount of time Council and Staff spent on after -the-fact stuff <br />on this property compared to other properties, it does not make sense. A lot of residents play by the rules <br />and follow the letter of the law and find ways to accomplish projects without after -the-fact stuff. She said <br />she would put money on the table that there will be another after-the-fact issue. <br /> <br />Johnson stated that will happen particularly if there is not a consequence. <br /> <br />Walsh noted with the stairs going down to th e lake they might get a pass, but the City has to keep their <br />eyes open in case there are different issues, not unlike the boathouse. <br /> <br />Johnson asked if there were different fees for after -the-fact variances. <br /> <br />Walsh said it was possibly double. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.