My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-27-2020 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2020
>
07-27-2020 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/12/2022 3:03:26 PM
Creation date
1/12/2022 2:56:21 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
349
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PARK COMMISSION <br /> Monday, March 2nd, 2020 <br />6:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Page 14 of 14 <br /> <br />where the City includes the consideration of the rowing club and having some sort of community <br />council or committee to represent the community at large. <br /> <br />Hudson supported and accepted the friendly good amendment. <br /> <br />The Commissioners discussed that the Park Commission is supporting that the proposal be brought to the <br />City Council with the following conditions: a master plan be completed, likely to be done by the Park <br />Commission; a citizen representative committee formed that has input into the master plan and process; <br />the proposal comes back to the Park Commission at some point after task number two. They also <br />discussed what the Park Commission should be voting on. <br /> <br />Berg seconded the motion as amended. <br /> <br />After discussion it was decided the motion should be restated. <br /> <br />Carter moved, Berg seconded, to move the proposal to the City Council for review with the <br />guidance that there needs to be a master plan created before there is any decision as to whether the <br />rowing club is part of the park or not, it needs to involve a broader set of community input, and the <br />Park Commission should have a role in that. VOTE: Ayes 6, Nays 0, Abstain 1 (Ruegemer). <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.