My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC minutes/10/27/97 - lk access/stubbs bay
Orono
>
Property Files
>
Street Address
>
B
>
Bayside Road - (AKA: Co. Rd. 84)
>
3580 Bayside Road - 05-117-23-12-0010
>
Correspondence
>
CC minutes/10/27/97 - lk access/stubbs bay
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/22/2023 5:15:54 PM
Creation date
8/19/2015 1:57:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
x Address Old
House Number
3580
Street Name
Bayside
Street Type
Road
Address
3580 Bayside Rd
Document Type
Correspondence
PIN
0511723120010
Supplemental fields
ProcessedPID
Updated
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL _ <br /> MEETING HELD ON OCTOBER 27, 1997 ;_ ,^, <br /> !,`r �, <br /> '� ' � � . <br /> Jabbour said the City and general public have used the land owned by the Olsen's for <br /> many years, noting it is used for parking, an occasional boat launch, and exercising of <br /> animals. Jabbour received confirmation from Mrs. Olsen that she does not want the City <br /> using her property any longer and is planning on barricading it. <br /> Jabbour asked Barrett what the City's legal position is regarding the access. <br /> Barrett said the Minnesota law allows for the ownership of the land to be that of the <br /> City's as it has been openly used and maintained by the City for more than 6 years. <br /> Barrett noted the improvements are obvious to the eye when viewing it. He suggested <br /> the Olsen's may have recourse with their title insurance company for the loss of the <br /> property and cost of the survey. <br /> Barrett said the City does not have fee title but does have a road easement. Gappa said <br /> the Olsen's are objecting to this opinion. <br /> Jabbour said, assuming the City has ownership of use, is the City interested in <br /> maintaining it. If so, what should be equitably decided regarding the Olsen's. If it is <br /> determined that it is not essential for the City to maintain the access, how can the City <br /> return the property to the Olsen's if they now have the right to the property. <br /> Banett said a formal vacation would have to occur to return the property to the Olsen's. <br /> Jabbour said that would include a public hearing. He questioned whether the DNR <br /> would have to be notified. Gaffron said any change to a piece of right-of-way along the <br /> 24 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.