Laserfiche WebLink
AGENDA ITEM <br />Item No.: 20 <br />Date: November 22, 2021 <br />Item Description: RPS 19-000161 — Dale & Jonmari Olsen, 3315 Crystal Bay Road — <br />Certificate of Occupancy and Escrow Release <br />Presenter: Jeremy Barnhart, AICP Agenda Community <br />Community Development Director Section: Development Report <br />1. Purpose. Staff is requesting direction regarding finalization of the building permit for 3315 Crystal Bay <br />Road. <br />2. Background/ Summary. In 2019, the property owners received land use approvals (LAI9-000069)to support <br />construction of a new home on the property at 3315 Crystal Bay Road. The home, constructed under building <br />permit RPS 19-000161, is now complete. A Temporary Certificate of Occupancy was issued in January 2021 due to <br />winter conditions which made final site verification difficult. At this time, the owners have requested issuance of <br />the final Certificate of Occupancy (CO) and release of their escrow. <br />In July 2021, upon inspection of the property, staff observed a newly installed wrought iron style fence <br />encroaching into the neighboring property. There had been an existing chain link fence in this location previously. <br />The property owner, Hennepin County Regional Rail Authority (HCRRA), noted the new fence, grading, <br />vegetation removal and removal of signs from their property. These activities occurred approximately 15-18 feet <br />into HCRRA's property. <br />Resolution No. 7042, which granted approval of variances and an interim use permit, included a condition that no <br />grading within the HCRRA easement (property) would be permitted without HCRRA permits or permission <br />(paragraph 4, page 8). Neither the builder nor homeowner applied for permits from HCRRA. <br />The site is stabilized, and all other conditions for release of a CO and escrow have been satisfied. However, <br />because of the activity in conflict with a condition of a Council approval resolution, Staff has not released the <br />escrow and issued the final certificate of occupancy until HCRRA has approved the improvements. HCRRA's <br />position is they will not support the improvements within their property, and have required the removal of the <br />fence from the property. <br />3. Request. The applicant requests the Council waive the condition requiring HCRRA approval. Doing so will <br />allow staff to issue a CO and release the escrow. Releasing the escrow and approving the final as -built does not <br />approve activity in HCRRA property. HCRRA can continue their enforcement action. <br />COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED <br />The Council should either waive the HCRRA condition or not. <br />Exhibits <br />A. Resolution 7042 <br />B. Email <br />Prepared By: mcc <br />Reviewed By: J. Barnhart <br />Approved By: <br />