My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
#5887 - variances
Orono
>
Property Files
>
Street Address
>
B
>
Bayside Road - (AKA: Co. Rd. 84)
>
3382 Bayside Road - 05-117-23-14-0069
>
Resolutions
>
#5887 - variances
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/22/2023 5:19:01 PM
Creation date
8/18/2015 11:13:52 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
x Address Old
House Number
3382
Street Name
Bayside
Street Type
Road
Address
3382 Bayside Rd
Document Type
Resolutions
PIN
0511723140069
Supplemental fields
ProcessedPID
Updated
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
. � O � <br /> O O <br /> '��}�-,, ;, CITY of ORONO <br /> � � <br /> .�* � <br /> �� "`� G~' RESOLUTION OF TNE CITY COUNCIL <br /> „ <br /> 9kESIIOg'� NO. � � <br /> g. The Applicants have proposed to install native plant materials within the 16.5' <br /> wetland buffer as required as well as additional areas of the Property in order <br /> to mitigate for some of the additional hardcover. <br /> h. The proposed footbridge over Stubbs Bay Creek is not proposed to <br /> accommodate any vehicular traffic. <br /> i. With 10% structural coverage, the proposed residence is below the structural <br /> lot coverage limitation of 15%. <br /> 4. Further, the Planning Commission reviewed this application at public hearings <br /> held on October 19 and November 16, 2009 and recommended approval of the <br /> conditional use permit for creek bank stabilization based on the following finding: <br /> a. The Applicants will comply with the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District's <br /> regulations. <br /> 5. The City Council has considered this application includin� the findings and <br /> recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments <br /> by the Applicants and the public, and the effect of the proposed variance on the <br /> health, safety and welfare of the community. <br /> 6. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this Property are peculiar to <br /> it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting <br /> the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, liaht, air nar pose a fire <br /> hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a <br /> convenience to the Applicants, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable <br /> hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property ri�ht of the <br /> Applicants; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code <br /> and Comprehensive Plan of the City. <br /> 7. The City Council finds that granting the conditional use permit would not be <br /> detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare or materially injurious to <br /> properties or improvements in the vicinity. <br /> Page 3 of 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.