Laserfiche WebLink
city does not have lots of record that would be considered undeveloped. Is that accurate? <br /> Also,the revised minor amendment proposes to strike 78-72(c)(3) entirely. Can you clarify why <br /> subpart 'b'cannot be kept? <br /> Wes Saunders-Pearce,CFM <br /> North Metro Area Hydrologist I Ecological and Water Resources <br /> Anoka & Hennepin Counties <br /> Minnesota Department of Natural Resources <br /> 1200 Warner Road <br /> Saint Paul, MN 55106 <br /> Phone: 651-259-5822 <br /> Fax: 651-772-7977 <br /> Email:Wes.Saunders-PearcePstate.mn.us <br /> mndnr.gov <br /> rnilk DEPARTMENT OF <br /> II NATURAL RESOURCES <br /> From: Melanie Curtis<MCurtisJci.orono.mn.us> <br /> Sent:Tuesday, October 26, 2021 4:19 PM <br /> To:Saunders-Pearce, Wes (DNR)<Wes.Saunders-PearcePstate.mn.us> <br /> Cc: Petrik, Daniel (DNR) <daniel.petrikPstate.mn.us> <br /> Subject: RE: Proposed Orono City Code Amendment- RE: Lots of Record <br /> Wes, <br /> Thank you for your feedback. I have discussed your feedback with our staff and the City's attorney. <br /> Because we do have a need for a solution in this area, I'd like to offer an alternative for your <br /> consideration. <br /> Our primary concern is the development and re-development of single non-conforming lots of record. We <br /> can agree to forgo the hardcover change in relation to groups of two or more contiguous lots of record <br /> under common ownership, but would like your consideration for our change relating to single lots of <br /> record. Please see the attached, revised draft amendment. <br /> We tabled the text amendment and would like to proceed with our next public hearing on November 15th <br /> with the attached changes. Please let me know your thoughts. Also, as I believe you understand our <br /> goal, do you have alternate suggestions for accomplishing it? <br /> Thank you, Melanie <br /> Melanie Curtis <br /> '2952.249.4627 ®mcurtisCaci.orono.mn.us <br /> All permitting is now done through our new online portal - LINK! <br />