My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-08-2021 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2021
>
11-08-2021 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/9/2021 8:32:12 AM
Creation date
11/9/2021 8:27:18 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
227
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />Monday, October 18, 2021 <br />6:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Page 2 of 2 <br /> <br />maintaining that number of hives. He is opposed to regulation; however, if there has to be a number on it <br />he thinks it should be higher. He clarified that 10 hives would take up an 8x8 space. Finally, Bollis noted <br />that counting these as an animal unit against other animals is hard as they have a symbiotic relationship <br />with a horse, they are not taking up the space that a horse does. He thinks it is confusing to tie it together <br />in the Code like that. Bollis does not think the honeybee hives should count against the aggregate total of <br />animals. <br /> <br />The Commissioners discussed whether to separate out the RR district and whether to have two separate <br />standards. <br /> <br />Oakden clarified currently she is proposing to amend the animal unit definition which is a flat one animal <br />unit equals six hives. She noted it is regulated differently within different districts. <br /> <br />Libby spoke in favor of the text amendment as presented. <br /> <br />Bollis stated, respectfully, there are many family farms operating in Orono and he does not think it makes <br />sense to regulate when there is no need for it. If there is a way to draft it so they are not regulating those <br />properties that would be great. He also does not believe the wetlands should be counted out of that <br />acreage because they are critical for the bees, and vice-versa. <br /> <br />The Commission discussed the issue further, with Ressler and Libby noting Bollis brings up some <br />thorough and interesting points. <br /> <br />Libby is uncomfortable with the idea of an animal unit that could negate the ability to have another <br />commonly owned recreational animal such as a horse or a goat. He is not comfortable voting and would <br />make a motion to table until it is further researched and discussed. <br /> <br />Erickson would like to see how other cities in the area handle honeybees. <br /> <br />Oakden shared that many neighbors do not permit honeybees or are silent about the issue within their <br />code. <br /> <br />Barnhart suggested removing honeybees from the definition of farm animals. Based on Staff workload, it <br />would likely not go before the Commission the following month. <br /> <br />Bollis suggested honeybees come out as a farm animal and honeybees are a CUP in the Lakeshore <br />Overlay District. He noted that might be a better way to regulate it. <br /> <br />Ressler agreed. <br /> <br />Gettman noted Staff is looking for a number. <br /> <br />Bollis moved, Gettman seconded, to approve LA21-000065, Text Amendment to City Code Chapter <br />78, striking honeybees from “farm animals” so they would be unregulated in the Rural Residential <br />District, and to draft regulation to make honeybees a CUP in the LA Districts with a number not to <br />exceed 12 hives per acre. VOTE: Ayes: 5, Nays 0. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.