My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-08-2021 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2021
>
11-08-2021 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/9/2021 8:32:12 AM
Creation date
11/9/2021 8:27:18 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
227
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
CITY OF ORONO <br />RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br />NO. 7232 <br />2 <br />3. The Property contains 5.85 acres in area and has a defined lot width of 200 feet. <br />4. Structural Building Coverage and Hardcover limitations do not apply due to the property’s <br />location in the exempt tier, and being over 2 acres. <br />5. Applicant has applied for the following variance[s]: <br />a. Side yard setback 23 feet where 30 feet is required <br />b. Building height, 36 feet, where 30 feet is permitted <br />6. In considering this application for variance, the Council has considered the effect of the <br />proposed variance upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and <br />anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the <br />effect on values of property in the surrounding area. <br />ANALYSIS: <br />According to MN §462.357 Subd. 6(2) variances shall only be permitted when: <br />1. The variance is in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the Ordinance. The intent of <br />the ordinance is to reduce massing with principal structures too close together, and to regulate <br />massing with tall buildings. Neither of these goals will be challenged with the variance. The <br />north property line is a boundary with undeveloped MnDOT property, adjacent to a drop off <br />for Hwy 12 and a rail corridor. The building height as defined reflects the drop off of slope <br />toward the west end of the building. From the street, the building will appear conforming. <br />2. The variance is consistent with the comprehensive plan. The use of the property is a permitted <br />use in the RR-1B zoning district. <br />3. The applicant establishes that there are practical difficulties. <br />a. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted <br />by the official controls; In the site design, the goal was to shift the building as far away <br />from neighboring residential parcels. To maximize the southern setback, the northern <br />setback was reduced. The building height is necessary for the internal workings of the <br />building (large truck lifts, storage) and due to the substantial slope of the lot from east <br />to west. <br />b. There are circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner; The <br />unique design of the lot, both from its long narrow shape and slope of the lot are unique <br />to the property and not created by the landowner and <br />c. The variance will not alter the essential character of the locality. The height variance and <br />the setback will not be discernible to the general neighborhood. Most of the work on <br />the site will occur in the west and north sides. <br />Additionally City Code 78-123 provides additional parameters within which a variance may be granted as <br />follows:
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.