Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, August 9, 2021 <br />6:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Page 5 of 13 <br /> <br />14. LA21-000029 – ROBERT ERICKSON, 365 WESTLAKE ROAD., STREET VACATION – <br />RESOLUTION NO. 7211 – Continued <br /> <br />Mr. Jabbour told him that would not happen. Life went on, and Mr. Jabbour noted he and Mayor Walsh <br />locked horns badly and subsequently tried to figure out in their own way to do good for the City. Mr. <br />Jabbour said Mr. Erickson was an only donor to Mayor Walsh in 2016. Mr. Jabbour is not accusing <br />Mayor Walsh of any wrongdoing, as the Mayor was kind enough to decide to run his campaign at his own <br />expense. Secondly, Mr. Erickson had himself appointed on the Comprehensive Plan Committee and for <br />the first year in 50+ years the group decided to strike the language prohibiting vacating any of those <br />parcels of land. Mr. Jabbour said before that, in October 2014, Mr. Erickson reached out to him through <br />Attorney Peter Johnson to have a meeting about Mr. Erickson buying a piece of land from Mr. Jabbour or <br />to have a way to facilitate this vacation. Mr. Jabbour dodged Mr. Erickson because he was taking boats <br />out and said he would do it in December. At that time, Mr. Jabbour decided not to do it. He called Peter <br />Johnson earlier today and asked if he recalled any conversation about selling land and Mr. Johnson <br />replied he could not see Mr. Jabbour selling the land as that is not his theory of public purpose. Mr. <br />Jabbour noted he spent 7-figures on City issues and he does not have to hustle a guy for $2.50. He noted <br />he has never in the last 25 years sold any land besides Big Island. He thinks the City Council should think <br />twice about who is selling land to Mr. Erickson. Mr. Jabbour does not appreciate Mr. Erickson’s <br />standards of morality to be broadcast on Mr. Jabbour as he is different, unique, and unusual. Regarding <br />the application, he asked the City Council to remember the first thing on the agenda was to sell Big Island <br />and second was to get rid of the docks. Today, this City Council embraces Big Island, invests in Big <br />Island, asks the Senator to bring State money to Big Island, and Mr. Jabbour helped and is helping today. <br />Things change and cities should think 5 years, 20, 50, and 100 years – when he testified in front of the <br />legislators to preserve some land, Big Island, Maxwell Bay, Gray’s Bay, he physically got money and did <br />those projects and told them if they are not careful, the only way they would see Lake Minnetonka is <br />through the historical society and in the theater. Passive enjoyment of the lake is profoundly important <br />and it is going to get to the point that they have such dense houses that people have to drive miles to be <br />able to see it. Is Mr. Jabbour selling land to Mr. Erickson? No. Mr. Jabbour bought that land to help the <br />City and there was a person who spent 5-10 years giving a hard time to his girlfriend and they can ask <br />Bruce Anderson who was there at the time – Mr. Jabbour bought him out, bought his boat, helped the <br />City get out of the mess they were in for the noise from Fletcher’s and Mr. Jabbour still owns the land and <br />never thought about selling it. He tried to use it as a safe crossing for snowmobiling in that channel and <br />the City has an appellate court order on it not to have docks. If the City would change its mind, that land <br />would be full of docks. How can Mr. Jabbour convince the City Council that he is not prostitute towards <br />financial gain? <br /> <br />Mayor Walsh replied besides the innuendo and hyperbole, he has not heard a lot of things about why this <br />application is a problem for Mr. Jabbour. Mr. Jabbour is correct that when the Comprehensive Plan came <br />up, Mr. Erickson was one of a number of people on the Committee because they wanted people who <br />understood all of the language and how the process works. Basically, the City took everyone as they <br />wanted everyone to have eyes on it. Years ago, one thing that was very frustrating was when the Comp <br />Plan said one could not do anything even though for 150 years around Orono there are weird little roads, <br />dead ends, and platted subdivisions in the middle of lakes; they changed that specifically so they could <br />look at each individual issue that comes up on its own merit. It is interesting to hear for this one today, <br />and noted the City has probably done 6 of these in the past 12 months so Mr. Jabbour has obviously <br />missed the other 6 but were all evaluated on their own merits – some of them worked and some did not. <br />Everyone at least has the opportunity to come and ask to see if it makes sense. He thinks the City Council <br />is pretty thoughtful on how they judge that and noted they are no just looking to get rid of land but if they