Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, June 14, 2021 <br />6:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Page 10 of 13 <br /> <br />22. LA21-000028 - CITY OF ORONO TEXT AMENDMENT RELATED TO SIGN <br />REGULATIONS – Continued <br /> <br />Johnson moved, Seals seconded, to approve LA21-000028, City Of Orono Text Amendment Related <br />To Sign Regulations as noted. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br /> <br />23. LA21-000034 – REPRISE DESIGN O/B/O BROOK INVESTMENT GROUP, LLC, 3423 <br />SHORELINE DRIVE – SKETCH PLAN <br /> <br />Barnhart presented a summary packet of information. The Applicants are seeking non-binding feedback <br />on a proposed sketch plan that would create one new commercial site for a potential drive-through <br />business. If a plat is approved, then any permitted use can go within that new lot; if it is a drive-through <br />business initially, that could change. Based on the review of the subdivision which is an existing lot and a <br />new lot, the lot meets the area and width requirements for the zoning district. However, once they split the <br />lot, Lot 1 will likely exceed the lot coverage in hardcover limits because most of the front area is paved <br />for parking and most of the back area is also paved for parking. There will likely be some need for <br />variance on both lots due to the nature of how the shopping center has developed over the years. <br /> <br />Mayor Walsh noted it is all paved now so they are not adding hardcover. <br /> <br />Barnhart stated no, they are just removing the lot area. Some of the Councilmembers may recall there <br />used to be a gas station on this lot and that clean-up finished 20-30 years ago. The Planning Commission <br />reviewed this in a public meeting but it was not a public hearing, and the City has since received a letter <br />of comment from a neighboring property owner. The subdivision and any variance will require a public <br />hearing. The Planning Commission was a bit concerned with the traffic backing up from the drive- <br />through onto the street. <br /> <br />Walsh noted it would be quite a ways to have traffic back up that far. <br /> <br />Johnson thinks it would be nice to see something there. <br /> <br />Barnhart noted the Planning Commission also spoke about potentially developing this as a PUD; Staff <br />will look into that a bit further, and that would require a zone change. Barnhart is not sure what the <br />benefit would be to a PUD, but they can look at that. <br /> <br />Corey Englund, Reprise Design 12400 Portland Ave S, Burnsville, noted the Applicant is looking at a <br />coffee shop concept which helps further with the stacking problem as many quick-serve coffee restaurants <br />can turn cars around in 2-3 minutes tops. This is an empty, vacant lot that is occasionally used for <br />fireworks sales and he thinks this is a very, very good improvement of the space. However, it does have <br />some difficulties with the site; there is a retaining wall to the south and east that is really binding them <br />just to the tiny quadrant shown on screen. He thinks it is perhaps a 6 foot drop in grade. He also believes <br />they need a minor setback variance on the east end and the hardscape and structural limitations for the <br />different plots. <br /> <br />Mayor Walsh noted they have a drive-through at Culver’s right now and there is historically not a back- <br />up there. Plus, in the winter, drive-throughs are beneficial and more convenient. <br /> <br />Crosby is comfortable with improving that corner.