My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-14-2021 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2021
>
06-14-2021 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/9/2021 7:26:26 AM
Creation date
11/9/2021 7:21:52 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
Text box
ID:
1
Creator:
Created:
11/9/2021 7:26 AM
Modified:
11/9/2021 7:26 AM
Text:
Council Exhibit C
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
211
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />Monday, May 17, 2021 <br />6:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br />4. LA20-000033 DUPONT CONSTRUCTION O/B/O CAROLYN & MASON HARDY, 1579 <br />MAPLE PLACE, VARIANCES <br /> <br />Carolyn Hardy, Applicant, was present. <br /> <br />Staff presented a summary packet of information (Item 4 on the Agenda under Public Hearings). The <br />applicant requests lot area and lot width variances; the property is 9,000 square feet in area, and has 50 <br />feet in width where 21,780 square feet and 100‐feet in width are required. This substandard Lot of Record <br />qualified for buildability without area and width variances and a new home was constructed on the <br />property in 2012. However, a qualifier for taking advantage of the Lot of Record status is a hardcover <br />limitation of 25%, although the property is within Tier 2 which allows a hardcover level of 30%. The <br />applicant would like to construct a slightly larger deck (140 square feet); therefore, lot area and width <br />variances are required. The applicant identified the substandard lot area and lot width as practical <br />difficulties. Staff agrees and finds the substandard size of the property a practical difficulty. Staff <br />recommends approval of the requested lot area and lot width variances which would permit the property <br />to utilize 30% hardcover – the applicant is proposing 27%. <br /> <br />Bollis asked the hardcover levels of the neighboring homes on each side. <br /> <br />Curtis replied many of the homes in this strip of Maple Place were built by the same builder who took <br />advantage of the Lot of Record status. She did not look to see if any had received lot area or width <br />variances, but they were all either conforming to 25% or had received variances. <br /> <br />Carolyn Hardy, 1579 Maple Place, stated they are the second owners and the deck was put in before they <br />purchased the property and is unsafe. There are simply trying to replace the bad deck with a good deck <br />and hopefully fit all four of their family out there. <br /> <br />Kirchner is trying to understand how much larger this deck would be. <br /> <br />Ms. Hardy thinks it is 8x9 foot deck and they are asking for a 10x10 deck. <br /> <br />Chair Kirchner opened the public hearing at 7:04 p.m. <br /> <br />Chair Kirchner closed the public hearing at 7:04 p.m. <br /> <br />Kirchner stated this seems fairly simple and reasonable; they are not maxing out the 30% hardcover level. <br />He asked if it expands any wider than the existing exterior of the home. <br /> <br />Curtis replied no it does not and it meets the setbacks. <br /> <br />Kirchner does not have any problems with this application. <br /> <br />Libby supports Staff’s recommendation. <br /> <br />Bollis questions how these lots were able to be developed in the first place with the Lot of Record. He is <br />sure they will have applications from other lots wanting to go to the 30%. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.