06-14-2021 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

PRACTICAL DIFFICULTIES DOCUMENTATION FORM LA21-000035 1. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the Zoning Chapter. Response: The property owner intends to update commercial signage in a tasteful and appropriate way consistent with the commercial nature of the property. Modifying canopy signage and lighting and replacing an outdated front-of-building sign will improve the success of the business and improve the appearance of the business and surrounding community. The proposed signage improvements are technically inconsistent with the current Zoning Chapter in limited ways that are not inconsistent with the purpose of the chapter or the comprehensive plan. The height of the canopy sign would be 30 inches, which is within the ordinance. Rather than two signs of 20 square feet, the canopy would be 3 sides at 12.7 square feet. The freestanding sign would be 97.6 square feet which exceeds the current ordinance and prior variance resolution with a vertical separation monument area of 141 square feet, which exceeds the current condition or the ordinance limitation of 67.5 square feet. 2. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property not created by the landowner. Response: The property is located at an unusual angle along West Wayzata Boulevard. The variance is necessary to improve visibility for an Orono-based gas station/ convenience store, especially in the case of the canopy which is uniquely visible from three sides. The new in-front signage is effective for traffic in each direction, and it permits the changing of prices remotely rather than by ladder during snow, rain, or wind storms. 3. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Response: The new signage is consistent in size and character with the existing signage, with the variance serving to improve function and safety and improve the overall character of the commercial strip along West Wayzata Boulevard. 4. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties if reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of the Zoning Chapter. Response: The intended signage is not a result of economic considerations, per se, but intended to improve the appearance and effectiveness of the signage to support commercial operations consistent with the City's plans. 5. Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 116J.06, Subd. 2, when in harmony with this Chapter. Response: N/A 6. The Board of Appeals and Adjustments or the Council may not permit as a variance any use that is not allowed under this Chapter for property in the zone where the affected Council Exhibit E LA21-35